Boltzmann's version of 2nd Law -log relationship

AI Thread Summary
Boltzmann defined entropy (S) as S = k log W, where W represents the number of microstates and k is a constant. The logarithmic relationship is crucial because it allows the entropy of combined systems to be additive; for two systems, the total number of states is the product of individual states (W_a * W_b), necessitating the logarithm to maintain the additive property of entropy. This ensures that S(container A & container B) equals S(container A) plus S(container B). The discussion also touches on the transition from Boltzmann's entropy formula to Planck's energy equation E = hf, though the reasoning behind this shift is not fully explored. Understanding this relationship is essential for grasping the foundations of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics.
celal777
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello List,

I understand Boltzmann defined entropy as log W where W is the number of microstates in the system time a constant "k" ; hence S= k Log W.

Can someone explain to me where the logarithmic relationship comes from please ?

Many thanks in advance,

Celal Berker
London, England
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want the Entropy to be a quantum that adds up when you're looking at more than one system: E. g. if you have two containers filled with gas, you want the relationship S(container A & container B) = S(container A) + S(container B).

But if the system A has W_a states and the system B has W_b states, the combined system has W_a W_b states: a product, not a sum. So youo have to take the logarithm of this number to get the relation above.
 
Many Thanks Bruno (is that your name?)

So how did Planck, by what thought or reasoning processes did he go from the relation S= k log W to E=Hf ?

--Celal
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top