Books for a Paper on "The Development of Newton's Mechanistic Universe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding suitable resources for writing a paper on "The Development of Newton's Mechanistic Universe - Principia (1687)" for a history class. The focus is on obtaining books that detail the historical context and development of Newton's theories rather than mathematical analyses. Participants suggest looking for biographies with substantial coverage of Newton's scientific contributions, as well as utilizing Wikipedia as a starting point for references, despite its limitations as a citable source. There's mention of Newton's reluctance to publish his work on mechanics and his greater interest in alchemy, highlighting the influence of Halley in encouraging him to document his discoveries, including the Law of Gravity. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for resources that bridge historical narrative and scientific development.
xatu
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Not sure if I posted this in the correct area, but hopefully it will be moved if I haven't done so.

I'm here asking you guys if you know any books relevant to writing a paper on the subject of "The Development of Newton's mechanistic Universe - Principia (1687)." It's for a history class, so it's not a mathematical dissection of Principia.

I was just assigned this today, but I'm guessing my prof wants a detailed description of pertinent events leading up to, and including, Newton's writing of his treatise on mechanics, Principia. I went to my university's library and snagged some books, but they're mostly biographies. I'm looking for something more focused on the development of his theories on mechanics.

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google is your friend here. There are Wiki articles on Newton and the Principia, both of which will contain references.
 
Figured I'd reach out here to see if anyone had recommendations.
 
I think the right place to look are good biographies (which are rare on science; with "good" I mean those that have a good coverage on the science)

J. Gleick, Isaac Newton

which hasn't really convinced me concerning the analysis of his science.

I'm sure there is a lot better about this, but I don't know it. I only know the story that Newton wasn't very proud about the topics treated in his Principia. He was much more into alchemy than physics, and Halley had to insist that Newton must write up his discoveries about the mathematical description of (celestial) mechanics, including the universal Law of Gravity.

Maybe the Wikipedia article on Newton is a starting point to find the relevant (scientific!) sources about your topic. Note that it can only be a starting point. Usually the Wikipedia is not considered citeable in scientific papers (although this is often unjustified, but sometimes indeed not ;-)).
 
Thanks for the insightful reply vanhees! Very helpful!
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
48
Views
4K
Back
Top