Books for a Paper on "The Development of Newton's Mechanistic Universe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding suitable resources for writing a paper on "The Development of Newton's Mechanistic Universe - Principia (1687)" for a history class. The focus is on obtaining books that detail the historical context and development of Newton's theories rather than mathematical analyses. Participants suggest looking for biographies with substantial coverage of Newton's scientific contributions, as well as utilizing Wikipedia as a starting point for references, despite its limitations as a citable source. There's mention of Newton's reluctance to publish his work on mechanics and his greater interest in alchemy, highlighting the influence of Halley in encouraging him to document his discoveries, including the Law of Gravity. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for resources that bridge historical narrative and scientific development.
xatu
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Not sure if I posted this in the correct area, but hopefully it will be moved if I haven't done so.

I'm here asking you guys if you know any books relevant to writing a paper on the subject of "The Development of Newton's mechanistic Universe - Principia (1687)." It's for a history class, so it's not a mathematical dissection of Principia.

I was just assigned this today, but I'm guessing my prof wants a detailed description of pertinent events leading up to, and including, Newton's writing of his treatise on mechanics, Principia. I went to my university's library and snagged some books, but they're mostly biographies. I'm looking for something more focused on the development of his theories on mechanics.

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google is your friend here. There are Wiki articles on Newton and the Principia, both of which will contain references.
 
Figured I'd reach out here to see if anyone had recommendations.
 
I think the right place to look are good biographies (which are rare on science; with "good" I mean those that have a good coverage on the science)

J. Gleick, Isaac Newton

which hasn't really convinced me concerning the analysis of his science.

I'm sure there is a lot better about this, but I don't know it. I only know the story that Newton wasn't very proud about the topics treated in his Principia. He was much more into alchemy than physics, and Halley had to insist that Newton must write up his discoveries about the mathematical description of (celestial) mechanics, including the universal Law of Gravity.

Maybe the Wikipedia article on Newton is a starting point to find the relevant (scientific!) sources about your topic. Note that it can only be a starting point. Usually the Wikipedia is not considered citeable in scientific papers (although this is often unjustified, but sometimes indeed not ;-)).
 
Thanks for the insightful reply vanhees! Very helpful!
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
48
Views
4K
Back
Top