Books that emphasize Heisenberg picture

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Heisenberg picture in quantum mechanics, highlighting its historical context and limitations compared to Dirac's transformation theory. It is noted that while the Heisenberg picture can be rigorously explained, modern quantum mechanics typically requires a more comprehensive framework. Bill recommends "Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development" by Ballentine for its rigorous approach to the Heisenberg picture. The equivalence of different pictures in quantum mechanics is emphasized, with the choice of picture affecting how time dependence is represented between state operators and observables. For relativistic quantum field theory, Weinberg's "Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 1" is suggested as a solid resource.
IvanPavlov
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi fellas,

one friends that is Mathematician asked me to recommend some textbook that emphasizes Heisenberg picture and where this picture is rigorously explained. If anyone knows some good book for this I would be grateful :)

Regards,
Ivan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ivan

Trouble is that picture was well and truly superseded when Dirac came up with his transformation theory which generally goes under the name of QM today. It's virtually impossible to rigorously develop QM by the Heisenberg picture alone these days - you can only explain it within the full QM machinery.

I recommend - Ballentine - Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/9810241054/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Here QM is fairly rigorously developed from just 2 axioms and the Heisenberg picture correctly placed in that development.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any picture is equivalent (in usual QM; there are subtle troubles in QFT, known as Haag's theorem). It's just your choice of how to share the time dependence between the state operator (i.e., the statistical operator) of the system and the (self-adjoint) operators representing observables. This is only defined up to a time-dependent unitary transformation and is known as the choice of the picture. The Heisenberg picture is the one that is most closely related to the way classical mechanics is formulated in terms of the Hamilton formalism using Poisson brackets and lumps all time dependence to the observable operators. The Schrödinger picture is the one where the entire time dependence is put to the statistical operator and the observable operators are time independent. The most general picture is due to Dirac, where you choose one part of the Hamiltonian, \hat{H}_0 to propagate the observable operators and one part \hat{H}_1 that propagate the statistical operator. In any case you have \hat{H}_0+\hat{H}_1=\hat{H}, and the outcome for observable quantities (probability distributions for finding a certain possible value for an observable, average values for observables, transition probabilities like S-matrix elements, etc.) is independent of the choice of the picture of time evolution.

A good explanation of the Heisenberg picture for relativistic QFT is given in

Weinberg, Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 1

Usually QFT textbooks use the Heisenberg picture to start with and then derive perturbative QFT (Feynman diagrams) using the interaction picture (usually ignoring Haag's theorem of course ;-)).
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
Back
Top