Books that emphasize Heisenberg picture

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Heisenberg picture in quantum mechanics, highlighting its historical context and limitations compared to Dirac's transformation theory. It is noted that while the Heisenberg picture can be rigorously explained, modern quantum mechanics typically requires a more comprehensive framework. Bill recommends "Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development" by Ballentine for its rigorous approach to the Heisenberg picture. The equivalence of different pictures in quantum mechanics is emphasized, with the choice of picture affecting how time dependence is represented between state operators and observables. For relativistic quantum field theory, Weinberg's "Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 1" is suggested as a solid resource.
IvanPavlov
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi fellas,

one friends that is Mathematician asked me to recommend some textbook that emphasizes Heisenberg picture and where this picture is rigorously explained. If anyone knows some good book for this I would be grateful :)

Regards,
Ivan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ivan

Trouble is that picture was well and truly superseded when Dirac came up with his transformation theory which generally goes under the name of QM today. It's virtually impossible to rigorously develop QM by the Heisenberg picture alone these days - you can only explain it within the full QM machinery.

I recommend - Ballentine - Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/9810241054/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Here QM is fairly rigorously developed from just 2 axioms and the Heisenberg picture correctly placed in that development.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any picture is equivalent (in usual QM; there are subtle troubles in QFT, known as Haag's theorem). It's just your choice of how to share the time dependence between the state operator (i.e., the statistical operator) of the system and the (self-adjoint) operators representing observables. This is only defined up to a time-dependent unitary transformation and is known as the choice of the picture. The Heisenberg picture is the one that is most closely related to the way classical mechanics is formulated in terms of the Hamilton formalism using Poisson brackets and lumps all time dependence to the observable operators. The Schrödinger picture is the one where the entire time dependence is put to the statistical operator and the observable operators are time independent. The most general picture is due to Dirac, where you choose one part of the Hamiltonian, \hat{H}_0 to propagate the observable operators and one part \hat{H}_1 that propagate the statistical operator. In any case you have \hat{H}_0+\hat{H}_1=\hat{H}, and the outcome for observable quantities (probability distributions for finding a certain possible value for an observable, average values for observables, transition probabilities like S-matrix elements, etc.) is independent of the choice of the picture of time evolution.

A good explanation of the Heisenberg picture for relativistic QFT is given in

Weinberg, Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 1

Usually QFT textbooks use the Heisenberg picture to start with and then derive perturbative QFT (Feynman diagrams) using the interaction picture (usually ignoring Haag's theorem of course ;-)).
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top