Born-Oppenheimer approximation

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaejoon89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation
jaejoon89
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to figure out what the Hamiltonian for a simple molecule is using the Born-Oppenheimer approximation.

1) My textbook gives the Hamiltonian for a simple system like H2 when you hold the internuclear distance constant. The only terms that drop out are the ones where you take the Laplacian for the atoms. Since the B-O approximation separates the wavefunction into nuclear and electronic components, I'm guessing this must be the electronic component.

2) But what does the nuclear Hamiltonian look like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you trying to find the full Hamiltonian? If so you need to add up all contributions to the energy from the different sources and then apply the Born-Oppenheimer approximation.

The Born-Oppenheimer treats the nuclei as fixed, so they have zero kinetic energy and the interaction between them is constant, this will simplify the full Hamiltonian and give you a chance of separating electronic and nuclear potential energy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top