Boundary condition at junction of heated rods

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on formulating boundary conditions for a 1D heat conduction problem involving two joined rods with different lengths, cross-sectional areas, and thermal conductivities. The key equation presented is the heat conduction equation, α²u_{xx} = u_t, where α² = k/(sρ). The boundary condition at the junction of the rods is proposed as u_{x} = hu, where h is a constant related to thermal properties. The challenge lies in determining the value of h in terms of thermal conductivity (k), specific heat (s), cross-sectional area (A), and mass density (ρ), particularly when considering the effective properties at the junction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 1D heat conduction principles
  • Familiarity with thermal conductivity (k) and specific heat (s)
  • Knowledge of mass density (ρ) and cross-sectional area (A)
  • Basic grasp of boundary condition formulations in heat transfer problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of boundary conditions for heat conduction problems
  • Learn about effective thermal conductivity in composite materials
  • Study the implications of different boundary conditions in heat transfer analysis
  • Explore numerical methods for solving heat conduction equations in multi-rod systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermal engineering, mechanical engineering, and physics who are dealing with heat conduction problems, particularly those involving multiple materials and junctions.

musemonkey
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
1. 1D heat conduction problem: Two rods, the first of length a, the second of length L-a with respective cross sectional areas A_1,A_2 and heat conductivities k_1, k_2, are joined at one end. There are some boundary conditions on the other ends of the rods, but my question is only: how to write the boundary condition at the juncture?

Homework Equations



Heat conduction eqn:

\alpha^2 u_{xx} = u_t

where \alpha^2 = \frac{k}{s \rho}, in which \rho is the density and s is the specific heat with units: energy / (mass degrees).

More fundamentally, heat flux through a cross-section per unit time is

H = - k A u_x.

General form of boundary condition at non-insulated rod end is given in the text as

u_{x} = h u
where h is some constant (presumably with units inverse length).

The Attempt at a Solution



The idea of the u_{x} = h u is intuitive enough: the heat flux from a surface is proportional to its temperature, but I can't figure out what h is in terms of thermal conductivity k, specific heat s, cross-sectional area A, and mass density \rho. In other words, I can't even figure out how to set-up the simpler problem of a non-insulated rod end not connected to anything, much less two rods joined together, but my common sense tells me that the joined-rods problem reduces to the one rod end case because the effective conductivity and area at the junction should be min(k_1, k_2) and min(A_1, A_2) because what ever flows out of one rod has to be absorbed into the other. Actually I doubt this is right just from the way the problem is worded but it's the only thing that makes sense to me... To figure out h I've tried playing with units:

Letting E = energy, L = length, T = temp, t = time, M = mass, I tried to combine

thermal conductivity k = \frac{E}{L\cdot T\cdot t},

specific heat s = \frac{E}{M\cdot T},

mass density \rho = \frac{M}{L^3},

and cross-sectional area A = L^2

into units of inverse length. No success. Would much appreciate any guidance on how to write and think about the boundary conditions are for the two cases: one rod end and two joined rod ends with different material properties.

Just to be clear, the one rod end case is the one for which the text gives the form of the boundary condition. I'm puzzled as to how to think about it: Whatever heat is emitted has to be absorbed by something else, and how well that something can absorb one would think must be taken into account. So when we talk about one non-insulated rod end, does it mean, for examples, implicitly in a vacuum, in a medium with the same material properties, or in some ideal medium with perfect absorption? Lots of questions. Thank you for reading!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would still much appreciate any help with this question.
-Musemonkey
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
8K