Boundary Conditions for Hydrogen Schrodinger Equation

space-time
Messages
218
Reaction score
4
If I am trying to derive the energy eigenvalues and quantum numbers for the hydrogen atom (basic hydrogen-1), I obviously need to solve the hydrogen Schrodinger equation and account for some boundary conditions. However, no website ever gives me the boundary conditions. What would be the boundary conditions for the hydrogen atom?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual thing is to have the wave function go to zero as radius goes to infinity. Is that enough?
 
DEvens said:
The usual thing is to have the wave function go to zero as radius goes to infinity. Is that enough?
Integral of Psi*Psi needs to be finite (square integrable). You can have a function go to zero as r->inf. that would not be square integrable.
 
The usual method of separation of variables imposes a 'boundary' condition that the spatial components of the solution are independent of time - i.e. time-invariant.
This may be excessive, as the requirement that the final wave function be square-integrable permits wave functions that are periodic with finite integrability.
The other boundary conditions also imposed by the method are that the components of the wave function in polar coordinates are orthogonal and normal.
The polar coordinates themselves are part of this, in that in other coordinate systems (rectilinear, cylindrical) the wave functions are NOTsquare-integrable.
 
Quantum Defect said:
Integral of Psi*Psi needs to be finite (square integrable). You can have a function go to zero as r->inf. that would not be square integrable.

That is normalization, not boundary condition.
 
Quantum Defect said:
Integral of Psi*Psi needs to be finite (square integrable). You can have a function go to zero as r->inf. that would not be square integrable.
And you can have square integrable functions which don't go to 0 when their argument goes to infinity.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top