Boundary Conditions for Waves in Joined Strings with a Knot of Mass

mathlete
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
I'm given the fact that two strings under tension T are joined by a knot of mass m... I'm supposed to find the appropriate boundary conditions. I know that the tensions are the same in both ropes and that the boundary will be continuous. I know the "trick" in this problem is knowing the derivatives don't equal because of the knot of mass m, but I don't really know how to formulate it. Can anyone provide a nudge in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can make progress by making of use of Newton's laws for the massive knot while remembering that the string is continuous. In other words, the boundary conditions have to insure that the massive knot, which is a point but with non-infinitesimal mass, stays with the string.
 
I understand that part, but I'm not sure how to formulate it... I get df/dz (from the left) - df/dz (from the right) = m/T but I don't think that's right.
 
mathlete said:
I understand that part, but I'm not sure how to formulate it... I get df/dz (from the left) - df/dz (from the right) = m/T but I don't think that's right.
Close.
1. Should =-mg/T.
2. You need sin\theta. (Unless you can make a small angle approx.)df/dz is tan\theta.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top