- #1
thenewmans
- 168
- 1
These guys claim "Spooky Action at a Distance" is 10,000 times c.
This doesn't make sense to me. Since they're trying to measure a time difference that's faster than light, don't they're measurements depend on their inertial frame of reference? I mean wouldn't they come up with a different answer just by changing they're speed relative to the experiment? I would think they could even pick the speed they want, even backwards in time, just by moving the right way.
Quote from paper:
In any inertial frame, c is the same. So I don't understand that.
(I admit I haven't read the whole thing.)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.0614
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/...stance-at-least-10000-times-faster-than-light
This doesn't make sense to me. Since they're trying to measure a time difference that's faster than light, don't they're measurements depend on their inertial frame of reference? I mean wouldn't they come up with a different answer just by changing they're speed relative to the experiment? I would think they could even pick the speed they want, even backwards in time, just by moving the right way.
Quote from paper:
Here, we strictly closed the locality loopholes by observing a 12-hour continuous violation of Bell inequality and concluded that the lower bound speed of `spooky action' was four orders of magnitude of the speed of light if the Earth's speed in any inertial reference frame was less than 10-3 times of the speed of light.
In any inertial frame, c is the same. So I don't understand that.
(I admit I haven't read the whole thing.)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.0614
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/...stance-at-least-10000-times-faster-than-light