Box with a horizontal force at the top

AI Thread Summary
When a cubical box is subjected to a horizontal force not at its center of gravity, it experiences both linear acceleration of its center of mass and torque that causes angular acceleration. The torque generated leads to rotation about the center of mass because this point simplifies the analysis of motion, combining translation and rotation effects. While any point can serve as an axis of rotation, using the center of mass avoids complications that arise from mixing translational and rotational motion. The instantaneous axis of rotation can vary, but the center of mass remains the key reference for understanding the overall motion. This explanation aligns with Newton's laws of motion and provides a foundational understanding of the dynamics involved.
chandran
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
Theory says that a cubical box when subjected to a force horizontally(not at the centre of gravity) then the force will tend to rotate the box around the centre of gravity. Any proof can be given for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a consequence of Newton's laws of motion. The off-center force, assuming it's the only force acting, does two things:
(1) It accelerates the center of mass
(2) It exerts a torque about the center of mass, producing an angular acceleration
 
docal,
that is where i am asking. Why don't the box rotate about some other point. why it should rotate about cg. Any mathematical proof?

thanks.
 
I think I see what the issue is. Since torque can be found with respect to any point, then any point can be considered as an "axis of rotation". This is true. But for any point other than the center of mass you will be mixing up the translation with the rotation. So using the center of mass is for convenience in describing the motion: the motion of an object is the sum of the translation of its center of mass plus the rotation about the center of mass.

Note that this does not mean that the object is in pure rotation about the center of mass! The instantaneous axis of rotation (the point about which the object appears to be in pure rotation) can be anywhere.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top