Boy Seated On Mound of Ice, Starts Sliding

  • Thread starter Thread starter yrsnkd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice Sliding
AI Thread Summary
A boy seated on a hemispherical mound of ice begins sliding down after a small push, and the discussion centers on determining the height at which he leaves the ice, assuming a frictionless surface. The conservation of mechanical energy is crucial, with gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy being key components. The normal force acts on the boy while he is in contact with the ice but vanishes when he leaves, influencing his kinetic energy. A force diagram and equations related to centripetal force and energy conservation are suggested as methods to solve the problem. The relationship between the angle of descent and the height at which he leaves the ice is also emphasized.
yrsnkd
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. A boy is seated on the top of a hemispherical mound of ice with radius R. He is given a very small push and starts sliding down the ice. At what height does he leave the ice if the ice is frictionless?



2. Conservation of Mechanical Energy: U1 + K1 = U2 + K2; also gravitational energy mgy and kinetic energy (1/2)mv2



3. The normal force vanishes when the boy leaves the ice; up until that point, however, the normal force pushes him with a force that changes in magnitude and direction with his sliding off. Since work is the integral of a force over a distance, this is where the boy must get the kinetic energy from, besides the gravitational force. Past that, though, I have no idea what to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yrsnkd said:
1. A boy is seated on the top of a hemispherical mound of ice with radius R. He is given a very small push and starts sliding down the ice. At what height does he leave the ice if the ice is frictionless?

3. The normal force vanishes when the boy leaves the ice; up until that point, however, the normal force pushes him with a force that changes in magnitude and direction with his sliding off. Since work is the integral of a force over a distance, this is where the boy must get the kinetic energy from, besides the gravitational force. Past that, though, I have no idea what to do.

That's a neat problem, and the approach is not immediately obvious to me. Have you tried a force diagram? I think you can treat him at every point as though he were on an incline tangent to the surface. Do you know the general form for the normal force and net for for a body sliding down a frictionless incline?
 
yrsnkd said:
The normal force vanishes when the boy leaves the ice; up until that point, however, the normal force pushes him with a force that changes in magnitude and direction with his sliding off. Since work is the integral of a force over a distance, this is where the boy must get the kinetic energy from, besides the gravitational force. Past that, though, I have no idea what to do.
The normal force does no work, so it can't change the KE. You might want to try applying your conservation of energy equation between the known point and unknown point where N = 0, to give one equation, then try using the centripetal force equation at that point for a 2nd equation.
 
mgcos(theta) = m[(v^2)/R]
mgcost(theta) = m[(v^2)/R]
gcos(theta) = (v^2)/R
Where theta is the angle for the tangent line. I think this should be correct.
 
If \theta is the angle betwen the gravitational force vector on the boy and the position vector from the center of the sphere to the boy, then the height of the boy is always h \cos \theta where h is the radius of the sphere.
At the time the boy leaves the sphere, the centripetal force is mg \cos \theta
and this is equal to centripetal acceleration.
Also consider conservation of mechanical energy to find that
mgh = 1/2 m v^2 + mgh \cos \theta
These relations should help
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top