Boyle's Law Explained: How Temperature and Pressure Affect Volume

  • Thread starter Thread starter kandyce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chem Experiment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an experiment demonstrating Boyle's Law, which explains the relationship between pressure and volume in gases. When the can was heated and then cooled in water, the decrease in temperature led to a decrease in volume and pressure inside the can, causing it to implode due to higher atmospheric pressure outside. Turning the can upside down was a method to prevent rapid air entry, which could disrupt the pressure balance. Participants noted that Boyle's Law applies, but it was clarified that it specifically addresses pressure and volume relationships, not temperature effects. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately analyzing the experimental results.
kandyce
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hey i need help with this 1 i did the experiment but this last problem is killing me

Analysis
Hint: As you are thinking about this we want you to know that the water in the can and in the pan is only there to heat or cool the air in the can. In 5.07 you studied the relationships of temperature and pressure as it affects volume. Use this knowledge in explaining your results. Also, don't forget about atmospheric pressure!
Before you begin the analysis think about what was actually happening to the gases inside versus outside the can. Think in terms of where the pressure is greatest, versus less.
1. What happened when you put the can in the water?
The can imploded and made a “popping” noise.


2. Why did this happen?
This happened because when the temperature in the can decreased, the volume in the can decreased as well. This made the pressure inside the can decrease. The result was the pressure inside the can was lower than the pressure outside of it. The atmospheric pressure made the can implode and pushed the sides of the can together.


3. Why did you have to turn the can upside down?
I think the can was turned upside down so that air would not get into the can really fast. This prevents it from increasing the decrease in the air volume inside the can.


4. What gas law would account for what happened?
The law that would account for what happened would be Boyle's Law.


5. Explain how your choice of this gas law is supported by your observations.



?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kandyce said:
This happened because when the temperature in the can decreased, the volume in the can decreased as well. This made the pressure inside the can decrease. The result was the pressure inside the can was lower than the pressure outside of it.

The pressure of WHAT? The volume of WHAT? You have the right idea, however.
3. Why did you have to turn the can upside down?
I think the can was turned upside down so that air would not get into the can really fast. This prevents it from increasing the decrease in the air volume inside the can.

This is very confusing.

4. What gas law would account for what happened?
The law that would account for what happened would be Boyle's Law.

Kind of, but Boyle's law only gives the relationship between pressure and volume. It doesn't say that pressure decreases when temperature does for constant volume or volume decreases when temperature does for constant pressure.
 
You have not described the experiment, so we have to guess parts of it, but

kandyce said:
3. Why did you have to turn the can upside down?
I think the can was turned upside down so that air would not get into the can really fast. This prevents it from increasing the decrease in the air volume inside the can.

What happens to the hot air?

--
methods
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top