Your.Master
- 34
- 0
I can quickly up their odds to 12.5%
Let's call Art History guy A, Biochemistry guy B, Law guy L, and Math guy M.
They decide to label the desk closest to the door as 1 and the furthest is 4. Alternatively, if row is aligned such that no desk is closest the door, then you choose the rightmost as 1 and the leftmost as 4. Or we could do something with cardinal directions. Anyway, we just need them labelled.
A chooses between 1 and 2. 50% he's wrong, and then we've failed. Everybody else operates under the assumption he's right in his choice.
B chooses between 1 and 2. Since we're assuming A was right (otherwise, we're boned anyway), he has a 25% chance of being right. 50% times 25% is 12.5%.
L and M each choose between 3 and 4. A and B have to already be right, or else it doesn't matter. If they are right, then 1 and 2 are already accounted for, L and M are both guaranteed to get the right exam.
This isn't good enough yet, clearly, just my start.
Let's call Art History guy A, Biochemistry guy B, Law guy L, and Math guy M.
They decide to label the desk closest to the door as 1 and the furthest is 4. Alternatively, if row is aligned such that no desk is closest the door, then you choose the rightmost as 1 and the leftmost as 4. Or we could do something with cardinal directions. Anyway, we just need them labelled.
A chooses between 1 and 2. 50% he's wrong, and then we've failed. Everybody else operates under the assumption he's right in his choice.
B chooses between 1 and 2. Since we're assuming A was right (otherwise, we're boned anyway), he has a 25% chance of being right. 50% times 25% is 12.5%.
L and M each choose between 3 and 4. A and B have to already be right, or else it doesn't matter. If they are right, then 1 and 2 are already accounted for, L and M are both guaranteed to get the right exam.
This isn't good enough yet, clearly, just my start.