Breaking strength of a piece of material

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Material Strength
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the conditions under which a piece of material, specifically rope or wire, is more likely to break in different scenarios involving tension. The scenarios considered include one where two people pull on the material in opposite directions and another where the material is looped around a stationary pole. The focus is on the implications of stress distribution and the effects of geometry on breaking strength.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that in the case of two people pulling, the reaction force from one person is balanced by the force exerted by the other, leading to a straightforward analysis of breaking strength.
  • Others argue that when considering the finite thickness of the rope, the stress distribution may not be uniform when the rope is looped around a pole, potentially leading to localized stress concentrations that could cause failure.
  • A later reply suggests that decreasing the diameter of the pole increases the local stress on the rope, which could lead to breaking under certain conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic mechanics of tension in both scenarios, but there is disagreement regarding the implications of stress distribution and the effects of the rope's thickness and pole diameter on breaking strength.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the complexities introduced by the finite thickness of the rope or the specific conditions under which breaking might occur, leaving these aspects open for further exploration.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
Ok so I was wondering something... in which situation, if any, is a piece of material more likely to break in the real world...

1) A piece of rope or wire that is being pulled on by two people in opposite directions.

2) A piece of rope or wire being pulled but the other side is a looped around a stationary poll

Now if both of the pieces of rope are just closed loops... I assume that they'll both break under the same conditions since (if the two people use equal force) the normal force by the poll will simply be equivalent to the 2nd person 's pulling strenght from 1).

Am i right :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. You are correct. In the two person scenario, the one is the reaction force in the opposite direction. If the two people are pulling with diifferent forces. the lesser force is going to be what the rope/wire sees. The excess force will go towards accelerating the system (both people moving).
 
Pengwuino said:
Ok so I was wondering something... in which situation, if any, is a piece of material more likely to break in the real world...
1) A piece of rope or wire that is being pulled on by two people in opposite directions.
2) A piece of rope or wire being pulled but the other side is a looped around a stationary poll

Although, when the wire is considered a 1-dim object, you are correct of course that the two situations are equivalent, if you take into account the finite thickness of the rope, then I'd imagine you get a much uglier distribution of internal stress where the rope is tied up to the pole. In that case, you are more likely to (locally, somewhere within the cross section of the wire) to go beyond the maximally allowed stress and break the rope, then when two people nicely hold the rope in their hands and you get a nice, uniform distribution of stress across the section of the rope.
 
To extrapolate Vanesch's answer a tad...
If you decrease the diameter of the pole, you'll increase the local stress on the rope. You can see that if you get it down to a few molecules of thickness, it'll slice right through it like a knife.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K