Brightness detected based on direction of travel relative to source

wsellers
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I don’t see that this question has been asked before and I am hoping the generous moderators of this forum will be able to answer it.

Suppose you have the “standard” situation with the man M on the embankment and the woman W in the center of the moving train car. (The train has lots of windows enabling M to see in.) W strikes a match (it’s a special kind of match that has a constant luminosity, L). The distance between W (and the match) and the front of the car is D1; the distance between W and the back of the car is D2. Since we assume W is in the exact middle, D1=D2.

At each end of the car is a brightness detector with a digital LCD readout. Brightness is equal to L/4[pi]r, I believe, where L is luminosity and r is the distance from the light source to the detector. The distance that the light travels from the match to the front detector is r1; the distance that the light travels from the match to the rear detector is r2.

Because the train is moving toward the front, r1 > r2. This should mean that the rear detector measures a level of brightness that is greater than that measured by the front detector. Thus the rear detector would display a number that is greater than the number displayed by the front detector.

Wouldn’t M and W see the same numbers? In the same train car going in the opposite direction, wouldn’t the rear detector display a number that is less than the number displayed by the front detector?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the train is moving toward the front, r1 > r2. This should mean that the rear detector measures a level of brightness that is greater than that measured by the front detector.
You forgot the http://www.anu.edu.au/Physics/Searle/Obsolete/Seminar.html" (I found this site independently :wink: ).
Quick explanation: There are many effects you have to consider, all of which conspire to make the Lorentz Transformations valid. However, if you look at it differently: The LT are indeed valid (or, at least, self-consistent), and all those effects are simply derived from it. So it is no miracle that all works out self-consistently.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Energy is a frame-variant quantity so luminosity (energy/time) and brightness (luminosity/area) are also frame variant. A detector moving away from a source will generally detect lower energy than one moving towards a source as the Doppler red-shift lowers the energy of the detected photons, but does not change the number of photons.
 
Thanks very much! I wasn't aware of the headlight effect.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top