Bring Speedo Up in Ford Mondeo with Frequency Doubler

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ferret
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem with the speedometer in a 2000 Ford Mondeo 1.6, which is reading half of the actual speed. Participants explore potential causes and solutions, particularly focusing on the use of a frequency doubler to correct the speed reading. The conversation includes technical aspects related to the vehicle's speed sensor and gearbox, as well as considerations for building or purchasing a solution.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Ferret describes the speedometer issue and suggests using a frequency doubler on the Vehicle Speed Sensor (VSS) wire.
  • Some participants inquire about the type of sensor in the gearbox and the number of wires it has, suggesting it may be a Hall effect sensor.
  • Ferret confirms the VSS has three wires and expresses certainty that the issue lies within the gearbox rather than the sensor or wiring.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of doubling the frequency and whether it would affect other systems besides the speedometer.
  • Participants question the functionality of the odometer and whether it is also reading incorrectly.
  • Some suggest that the problem could stem from a compatibility issue due to a potential gearbox swap.
  • There are suggestions for building a frequency doubler circuit, with varying opinions on the feasibility and required components.
  • One participant mentions that older vehicles with mechanical speedometers could simply swap gears, prompting a discussion about similar solutions for electrical pickups.
  • Another participant provides a link to a commercial product that may solve the issue, while others express interest in building a solution themselves.
  • Concerns are raised about the range of frequencies that need to be covered and the reliability of potential solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact cause of the speedometer issue or the best solution. Multiple competing views and suggestions for both building and purchasing a frequency doubler remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the specifics of the signal output from the gearbox and the exact requirements for any proposed frequency doubler circuit. Some participants express doubts about the effectiveness of certain components and the range of frequencies involved.

Ferret
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I hope someone can help... Basically, I own a 2000 Ford Mondeo 1.6, and my speedo is reading half of my actual speed. Now we've got it down to something inside the gearbox.

So, I now need to bring my speedo up - And the only method I can think of using is a frequency doubler.

I've come across this PDF: http://www.wenzel.com/pdffiles1/pdfs/diodedbl.pdf

I don't suppose anyone here can make better sense of what I need ?

The frequency doubler will need to be put on the wire for the VSS (Vehicle Speed Sensor)

Thanks a lot,
Ferret !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
So some things about this vehicle have been changed out and you have a compatibility issue? What type of sensor is in the gear box? How many wires are coming from it?
 
I'm not too sure on the circumstances surrounding how this has happened - I bought the car with this problem, cheap !

But like I say, I know for a fact that it's something inside the gearbox - Nothing to do with the sensor, or any wiring.

It has 3 wires coming off the sensor.

Thanks,
Ferret !
 
Ok. It is most likely a hall effect sensor. 3 wires would be: Power, ground, and signal. Does it look like a botched up job of some sort? Do things look 'put together'? I would guess that someone has swapped out the transmission. What happens if you disconnect the speed sensor? Is the speedometer the only thing that quits working? What I am getting at here, is that if you would double the frequency will it affect anything besides the speedometer? If it truly is a tranny sway that is causing it, then doubling the frequency should put everything back the way it is supposed to be.
 
Is your odometer working correctly?
 
Are there odometers that have half the sampling frequency? Or is this likely to be something like a magnet falling off on some wheel that a Hall Effect sensor is monitoring?
 
MATLABdude said:
Are there odometers that have half the sampling frequency? Or is this likely to be something like a magnet falling off on some wheel that a Hall Effect sensor is monitoring?

Generally automotive sensors will not have a magnet attached to a wheel. The sensor will have a magnet built in and use whatever moves past the sensor as a reluctor.
 
supernova is correct, the sensor has the magnet built in !

And no, the mile counter isn't working correctly - Again, it's about half of the mileage I'm doing !

Also, the VSS sensor has not been botched on. It's possible that the gearbox has been put on, and it's the wrong one, but I really don't think they've done that !

When I disconnect the VSS, it's only the speedo that stop's working - The rev counter works off the crank sensor.
Some cars rely on the VSS sensor heavily... Mine only relys on it for 2 things, 1 the speedo, and 2 the MPG calculator. So I have no running issue's - It's just annoying not knowing the speed I'm actually doing !

So do I have to make a circuit board for the frequency doubler, or is it as simple as just solder in a diode on the wire ?

Thanks,
Ferret.
 
on older vehicles with mechanical speedos, you could just swap out the gear where the cable connects to the trans. Steeda and other companies would sell different ratios for people with aftermarket tires/trans/diff. i would look around and see if there is a similar fix for vehicles that use an electrical pickup.
 
  • #10
Contact these guys:

http://www.dakotadigital.com/index.cfm/page/ptype=product/product_id=126/category_id=287/home_id=59/mode=prod/prd126.htm"
-
It is unlikely that the circuits you provided would help you much. Most hall sensors used in automotive have an open collector output. To the lesser informed that means that there is a switch that opens and closes to ground. So if you build something, you need a bit more than a diode/transformer frequency doubler. If you truly bought the vehicle cheap, the small cost of a module from the link I provided won't hurt you much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
That thing is kinda what I'm after, not a bad price either.

I'd prefer to find one in the UK though (thats where I'm from).

I was just hoping to build one myself.

Thanks,
Ferret !
 
  • #12
My car reads 12% fast. I'm told it's because the gear-pair is the wrong set for the rear-end.
 
  • #13
Mines reading about 50% slow - And it's a lot easier to build a frequency doubler, than to take the gearbox off.
 
  • #14
Ferret said:
Mines reading about 50% slow - And it's a lot easier to build a frequency doubler, than to take the gearbox off.

A CMOS 4046 might do the job. But we don't know what the goes-in-tas and goes-out-tas are.
 
  • #15
4046 or any PLL is not going to do the job. Consider the frequency range that needs to be covered. Oscillators typically cannot cover the range required here.
 
  • #16
Is the odometer also reading half as much?

Rather than assume the pulse rate is wrong, it could be that the electronics is blown.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Phrak - It is the pulse rate that's wrong... I've bypassed the wiring in the car, and directly wired another set on clocks straight onto the VSS, and still got the same results !
 
  • #18
OK. There's not a lot to go on without knowing what the signal coming out of the gearbox looks like. If it's a pulse that goes from about ground to +12volts, this might do it.

http://www.radiolocman.com/shem/shem-cache.html?di=11145"

10nF*10K ~ 100 microsecond plus width. The pulse width should be about half the pulse width coming out of the gear box at maxium speed or it won't work. Adjust the component values accordingly. It's cheap and dirty, but may serve...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
Consider the range of frequencies that need to be covered here. From 5-10 KPH to well over 100. I don't think pulse forming will work over that complete range reliably. Trust me, the unit in the link I provided works. There is a good reason I know this. :wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K