Broken Concrete as Fill versus Soil

AI Thread Summary
Using broken concrete as fill can be effective, but it requires proper compaction to prevent settling, typically achieved with a vibrating roller or smaller compacting units. While both broken concrete and soil can serve as fill, the choice depends on the intended use; broken concrete may complicate future landscaping efforts. The overall cost may vary, but both options necessitate compaction for stability. If the fill is beneath a slab or foundation, thorough compaction is crucial. Ultimately, the decision should consider both structural needs and future usability of the area.
rodsika
Messages
278
Reaction score
2
Hi,

Supposed the ground floor of a building needs to be raised 2 feet higher with respect to street level. How good is using broken concrete as fill versus putting soil? I heard one needs to compact the broken concrete. What do they exactly do when they compact it? Would the overall cost be the same as just putting soil? Which one is better?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Either works as fill. Both need to be compacted. They do that with a big roller machine that vibrates.
 
you can rent smaller lawn-mower sized compacting units as well.

are you pouring your slab or foundation on top of this or is this the ground around the building?

if it's just the ground, you are doing a dis-service by adding in hard to shovel concrete.
Future gardeners will curse you LOL

if it's under the slab or foundation, compact it very well to avoid settling.
 
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top