Brownian bridge and first hitting times

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tetef
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge
Tetef
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Letting W be a standard brownian motion, we define the first hitting times
T_{a}=inf\{t:W(t)=a\} with a<0
and
T_{b}=inf\{t:W(t)=b\} with b>0

The probability of one hitting time being before an other is :
P\{T_{a}<T_{b}\}=\frac{b}{b-a}

I'm looking for this probability in the case of a brownian bridge :
P\{T_{a}<T_{b} | W(t)=x\} with x<a

Could some one help me please?

Thx !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question looks confusing. Your last statement has x < a. Also did you mean W(0) = x? Your T definitions use t also.
 
I did mean what I wrote,

A standard brownian motion has W(0)=0

I use t in the definition T_{a}=inf\{t:W(t)=a\}to say the first hitting times are defined as : T_{a} is the smallest time t where the brownian motion does hit the level a i.e. W(t)=a

In the expression of the probability P\{T_{a}&lt;T_{b}|W(t)=x\}, t is the 'time of one observation'.
If you look for P\{T_{a}&lt;t\}, you're looking for the probability for W to hit a level a before t (t being the end of the observation).

Here, in the expression P\{T_{a}&lt;T_{b}|W(t)=x\}, I'm looking for the probability for one hitting time to be before the other, knowing that at the time t, the brownian motion will be equal to x, i.e. W(t)=x; and thus form a brownian bridge between 0 at time 0 (W(0)=0) and x at time t (W(t)=x)

P\{T_{a}&lt;T_{b}|W(t)=x\} could be asked for x\inℝ.
In my case I have x&lt;a. This implies, by continuity of the brownian motion, that T_{a} does exist before t. It might make it simpler, it might not...
 
Last edited:
I don't know if it's any use but, I've thought of this :

P\{T_{a}&lt;T_{b}|W(t)=x\}=\frac{p\{T_{a}&lt;T_{b}\cap W(t)=x\}}{p\{W(t)=x\}}

where capital P are probabilities and small p are probability density functions.

we know :
p\{W(t)=x\}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi t}}exp( -\frac{x^2}{2t})

we don't know :
p\{T_{a}&lt;T_{b}\cap W(t)=x\}

but we know that :
\int^{+∞}_{-∞} p\{T_{a}&lt;T_{b}\cap W(t)=x\}dx=\frac{b}{b-a}
Is that right?
 
I have not studied this problem in any detail, so I don't know if I can be of any further help.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top