Brownian motion, correlation functions

Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30
Hi. I have a doubt on the derivation of the correlation function for the velocity and position in Brownian motion from the Langevin equation.

I have that for a brownian particle:

##\displaystyle v(t)=v_0e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}t}+\frac{1}{m}\int_0^{t}dse^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}(t-s)}\xi(s)## (1)

##\displaystyle \xi(t)## is a Gaussian white noice with zero mean, such that ##\displaystyle \left <\xi(t) \right>_{\xi}=0##.

The assumption that the noise is Gaussian means that the noise is delta-correlated:

##\displaystyle \left < \xi(t_1)\xi(t_2) \right>_{\xi}=g\delta (t_2-t_1)##

Now, the book makes use of the fact that ##\displaystyle \left < v_0\xi(t) \right>_{\xi}=0##, and gives for the correlation function:

##\displaystyle \left < v(t_2)v(t_1) \right>_{\xi}=v_0^2e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}(t_2+t_1)}+\frac{g}{m}\int_0^{t_1}ds_1 \int_0^{t_2} ds_2\delta(s_2-s_1)e^{\frac{\gamma}{m}(s_1-t_1)}e^{\frac{\gamma}{m}(s_2-t_2)}## (2)

I think that this must be used: ##\displaystyle \left < y_1(t_1)y_2(t_2) \right>=\int dy_1 \int dy_2 y_1y_2 P_2(y_1,t_1;y_2,t_2)##

But I'm not sure of it, and I don't know what are the intermediate steps between (1) and (2).

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The thing is that the integrals I get confuses me. For a simpler case I was considering the average of velocity.

The book gives (subject to the condition that ##v(0)=v_0##): ##\displaystyle \left < v(t) \right>_{\xi}=v_0e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}t}##

So I think that this should mean: ##\displaystyle \left < v(t) \right>_{\xi}=\int_0^{t} v(t_1)\xi(t_1)dv(t_1)##

I can put all that in terms of an integral of time using the equations for brownian motion: ##\displaystyle \frac{dv(t)}{dt}=-\frac{\gamma}{m}v(t)+\frac{1}{m}\xi(t)##

Then ##\displaystyle \left < v(t) \right>_{\xi}=-\frac{\gamma}{m}\int_0^t v^2(t_1)\xi(t_1)dt_1+\frac{1}{m}\int_0^t v(t_1)\xi^2(t_1)dt_1##

And using (1): ##\displaystyle \left < v(t) \right>_{\xi}=-\frac{\gamma}{m}\int_0^t \left ( v_0e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}t_1}+\frac{1}{m}\int_0^{t_1}dse^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}(t_1-s)}\xi(s) \right )^2 \xi(t_1) dt_1+\frac{1}{m}\int_0^t \left ( v_0e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}t_1}+\frac{1}{m}\int_0^{t_1}dse^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}(t_1-s)}\xi(s) \right )\xi^2(t_1)dt_1##Anyone?

BTW, I'm using the book a modern course in statistical physics, by Linda Reichl.
 
Last edited:
##\xi(t)## is clearly a Gaussian, but I don't know what "shape" it has. Anyway, I think the integrals can be computed just using the given facts: ##\displaystyle \left <\xi(t) \right>_{\xi}=0## and ##\displaystyle \left < \xi(t_1)\xi(t_2) \right>_{\xi}=g\delta (t_2-t_1)##, and that's the point that concerns me. How to use those facts to compute the integrals.
 
I can get the result just by taking average on both sides, and then getting the average inside the integral. Thats what the book does, but what's the justification for doing that?

This is what I mean:

\displaystyle v(t)=v_0e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}t}+\frac{1}{m}\int_0^{t}dse^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}(t-s)}\xi(s)

\displaystyle \left &lt; v(t) \right &gt;=\left &lt; v_0e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}t}+\frac{1}{m}\int_0^{t}dse^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}(t-s)}\xi(s) \right &gt;=\left &lt; v_0e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}t} \right &gt; + \left &lt; \frac{1}{m}\int_0^{t}dse^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}(t-s)}\xi(s) \right &gt;

If then I take that: \displaystyle\left &lt; v_0e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}t} \right &gt; = v_0e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}t}

And: \displaystyle \left &lt; \frac{1}{m}\int_0^{t}dse^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}(t-s)}\xi(s) \right &gt;=\frac{1}{m}\int_0^{t}dse^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}(t-s)}\left &lt; \xi(s) \right &gt;=0

I get the desired result from the given first moment: \displaystyle \left &lt; v(t) \right &gt;= v_0e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}t}

But I would like to see a justification on those steps, i.e. how the first average gives the result it gives, and how the average can be taken inside the integral from the formal definition given for the average. I think it can be demonstrated from the definition of the average (in the same way that trivially can be demonstrated that the average of a sum is the sum of the averages).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top