BRST Symmetry and unphysical polarizations

  • Thread starter Thread starter lornstone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetry
lornstone
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am reading the BRST Symmetry section of Peskin and Schroeder but I can't find anywhere
why the BRST transformation for the gauge vector,
\delta A_\mu^a = \varepsilon \partial_\mu c^a
implies that only forward polarized states can create ghosts by applying Q, Q being define by
\delta \phi = \varepsilon Q \phi
I saw in a paper that it's obvious when we go to momentum space, but unfortunately it's not for me...

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm afraid I can't help, but one point about your post confuses me- why have you taken the D^{ab} from Peskin and Schroeder's treatment to be diagonal? Isn't it the covariant derivative in the adjoint of the gauge group?
 
Yes it is. But Peskin is considering the limit case where g is equal to zero
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top