Building a Motor Like the One in the Video

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around building a motor similar to one demonstrated in a linked video. Participants explore the mechanics of the motor, particularly focusing on the operation of the split ring commutator, the configuration of coils, and the use of permanent magnets. The conversation includes technical considerations and potential design alternatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the efficiency of powering only one solenoid at a time and whether two permanent magnets are necessary.
  • Another participant suggests that energizing more coils might require additional brushes and commutators, which could complicate the design.
  • It is proposed that having two magnets could provide greater force and a more even distribution during operation.
  • Discussion includes the configuration of the split ring commutator, with one participant noting it likely consists of three sections and emphasizing the importance of winding coils in the same direction.
  • Some participants share memories of similar designs from old slot cars, drawing parallels to the current motor design discussion.
  • There is a question about whether it matters which commutator segment is connected to each coil, with some participants affirming that it does matter.
  • One participant describes how coils are wired to the commutator segments, indicating that a coil is energized when positioned near the bottom of its rotation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the design and functionality of the motor, with no clear consensus on the best approach or configuration. Some agree on certain technical aspects, but multiple competing views remain regarding the necessity of components and design efficiency.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention potential issues with wiring configurations and the importance of coil arrangement, but there are unresolved questions about the optimal design and operational efficiency of the motor.

Nucular
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to build a motor like the one in this http://youtube.com/watch?v=h6Ev64h49wg&feature=related".

I can't seem to figure out how the split ring works. From what I can tell, only one solenoid would be powered at a time, but wouldn't that be inefficient? Also if only one is powered, would it be necessary to have 2 permanent magnets?

Maybe I'm missing something (which is very probable).

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Basically my question is should I go ahead with the design in the video, or is there a better way to build this motor than that offered in the video?

(Sorry about the second post, but I can't figure out how to edit my original post)
 
I'm reasonably sure that just one coil is energized, but I might be wrong. To energize more coils might require another pair of brushes and commutators, which could be cumbersome.

Having two magnets provides twice the force than having one magnet. Also, the force is more evenly distributed during the "power stroke" by having two magnets. With only one magnet, the force would be weaker when the energized coil has rotated farther away from the single magnet.

The split ring seems to be 3 pieces of some kind of sheet metal. Probably sections from a metal tube of some sort, so they are already curved.

I don't know if a better or easier design is out there, give this forum a day or two and see what kind of responses you get here. I think if I built one like in that video, I'd try having the magnets closer to the coils.

Good luck!

Mark
 
IIRC you only need three sections on the commutator (split ring).
The "start" wire of one coil is hooked to the "end" wire of the next coil and to one of the commutator segments in sequence.
So you need to make sure you wind all the coils in the same direction.
Also the angle at which the brush wires touch the commutator is important.
 
Anyone remember the old HO scale slot cars with an armature with 3 poles? They also had a 3 section commutator. The ones I recall had a vertical shaft and then gears on a plate out to the back wheels. They were wired as NoTime described. It is entirely possible that some or all of the newer cars that have an armature with a horizontal shaft also have 3 poles.
 
NoTime said:
The "start" wire of one coil is hooked to the "end" wire of the next coil and to one of the commutator segments in sequence.

I think this was my problem, I had each coil hooking up to 2 of the commutator segments, and not to any of the other coils.

Does it matter which commutator segment I hook it up to?

thanks
 
I think you can tell in the video which is hooked to which and yes it does matter.
 
Averagesupernova said:
I think you can tell in the video which is hooked to which and yes it does matter.

Do you think you can enlighten me as to which is hooked to which, as I cannot seem to figure it out.

thanks
 
  • #10
Near as I can tell, each coil is directly adjacent to one of the 3 commutators, and is wired to the other two.

Then a coil would be energized when it is near the bottom of the rotation.
 
  • #11
russ_watters said:

Thanks for that site russ, brings back a lot of memories. The original cars I had were the magna-traction. They didn't hold the track that well compared to the newer cars. I recall getting newer cars that stuck to the track like glue. You couldn't have a wreck if you tried. We got bored with them and went back to the old magna traction which required some skill to drive. Eventually some of the car bodies got so worn on their mounts that they would rock back and forth on the chassis as the car went down the track. Fun times...
 
  • #12
"They didn't hold the track that well compared to the newer cars."

Yes. You could make the fly.
 
  • #13
dlgoff said:
"They didn't hold the track that well compared to the newer cars."

Yes. You could make the fly.

And believe me we did!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K