Building a Pair of Helmholtz Coils - Questions & Tips

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on building Helmholtz coils for magnetism experiments, with specific questions about coil design and configuration. The user seeks clarification on whether the physical width of each coil affects performance and whether the distance between coils should be measured from their centers or closest points. Additionally, the user invites comments on practical challenges in constructing the coils. Understanding these factors is crucial for optimizing the coils' functionality in experiments. The inquiry reflects a desire for detailed technical insights into coil construction and measurement practices.
Froskoy
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm building a pair of helmholtz coils to do a variety of magnetism-related experiments. I've borrowed an old Avo Douglas coil winder and plan to do a couple of thousand turns on two sections of 50mm or 60mm diameter pipe. Some nylon threaded rod will pass through the middle of each coil, to make the distance between them tweakable, to ensure that the distance between them is exactly equal to the radius of each coil.

I have two questions:

1) Does the physical width of each coil have an effect? That is the width of each layer of the coil. Should this be minimised (e.g. just have five adjacent wires per layer) or does this not have any effect?

2) Is the distance r between the coils the distance between the centrepoint of each coil, or the distance between the closest points on each coil?

Any other comments to do with the practical aspects of making a pair of helmholtz coils and difficulties that may be encountered would be very much appreciated.

With very many thanks,

Froskoy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ASLAMUALIKUM
please someone inform me why we short circuit the deflection plates and connect them to anode while measuring the accelerating voltage?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top