Building a solar cell - semiconductors

mathman44
Messages
204
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Design a solar cell, designed to absorb solar light. Treat the sun as a blockbody source of T=5800K.

To design the cell, you may grow 4 very thin semiconductors of the following bandgaps, in eV:

1.43, 1.14, 1.35, 0.67, 1.75, 2.4, 2.7, 0.42, 3.37

Which of these would you use, and in which order would you arrange them and why?

Of the semiconductors, which would you use, in which order would you arrange them, and why?

The Attempt at a Solution



Using wein's law the peak wavelength of the blackbody spectrum at 5800K is around 500 nm, which is 2.48 eV. The minimum is around 250 nm (4.96 eV), and the max is around 1800 nm (0.68 eV).

---

So any semiconductor with a bandgap less than 2.48 eV will suffice to make electrons jump into the conducting band, similarily any semiconductor with BG less than 4.96 or 0.68 will suffice for the other extremes of the blackbody radiation.

I'm not sure how to put this together, any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Intuitively do you think longer or shorter wavelengths travel further through materials? Thinking about that might help you with the ordering of the layers.

You are asking the right questions about the width of the solar spectrum and needing to choose a set of band gaps that cover this width effectively.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top