Building blocks of the conduction and valence band

BBQBarney
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

I am new to PF. First I have to apologize for the following english -- it is not my native language.

I have problems in understanding the formation of the conduction and valence bands of solids:
For example in III-V compound semiconductors both constituents are sp3 hybridized. If one builds the solid piece by piece the single energetic levels split resulting in bands. My question is, why one says that the conduction band is (most) s-orbit type of the group III element and the valance band p-orbit type of the group V element, like the constituents were not hybridized.
Maybe there is a book or paper covering this topic?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
*push*
 
My question is, why one says that the conduction band is (most) s-orbit type of the group III element and the valance band p-orbit type of the group V element

sounds like a very good question to me. I would like to read more about that. any links?
 
BBQBarney said:
Hi folks,

I am new to PF. First I have to apologize for the following english -- it is not my native language.

I have problems in understanding the formation of the conduction and valence bands of solids:
For example in III-V compound semiconductors both constituents are sp3 hybridized. If one builds the solid piece by piece the single energetic levels split resulting in bands. My question is, why one says that the conduction band is (most) s-orbit type of the group III element and the valance band p-orbit type of the group V element, like the constituents were not hybridized.
Maybe there is a book or paper covering this topic?

Thanks
s orbit=conduction band and p orbit=valence band I could accept but why 'of group III' and 'of the group V'? doesn't make sense to me.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top