Bullet Hits Block Attached to Spring What am I doing wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a bullet striking a block attached to a spring. The user initially calculates the final velocity of the combined mass after the bullet embeds itself in the block, using conservation of momentum. However, they mistakenly use an incorrect mass for the bullet, leading to an erroneous amplitude calculation for the oscillation. A participant points out the error, noting that the mass of the bullet should be 0.00802 kg instead of 0.0082 kg. Correcting this mistake is essential for accurately determining the amplitude of the resulting oscillation.
sweetpete28
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
A wooden block of mass M = 1.83 kg is rest on a frictionless, horizontal table attached to the end of an unstretched spring (k = 217 N/m). A bullet of mass m = 8.02 g is fired horizontally into the block at speed vo = 394 m/s. The bullet comes to rest inside the block, and causes the mass to oscillate on the spring. If there is no friction between the block and the table: find A, the amplitude of the resulting oscillation. You can assume the mass never hits the wall (to which the spring is attached.)

Here is what I did, and I really don't see how this is wrong...

By conservation of momentum --> m1v1 = (m1 + m2)v2
(.0082)(394) = (1.83 + .0082)v2
v2 = 1.75759m/s

1/2mv^2 = 1/2kA^2

(1/2)(1.83802)(1.75759)^2 = (1/2)(217)A^2

A = .162m


How is this wrong??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check the mass value for the bullet that you used in the calculation of v2.
 
sweetpete28 said:
A wooden block of mass M = 1.83 kg is rest on a frictionless, horizontal table attached to the end of an unstretched spring (k = 217 N/m). A bullet of mass m = 8.02 g is fired horizontally into the block at speed vo = 394 m/s.

By conservation of momentum --> m1v1 = (m1 + m2)v2
(.0082)(394) = (1.83 + .0082)v2
v2 = 1.75759m/s

You dropped a zero from the mass of the bullet.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top