Bullet passes through block - conservation of momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a bullet after it passes through a stationary block and hits a person. Using conservation of momentum and the work-energy principle, the calculated velocity of the bullet is approximately 121.65 m/s, with some variations based on the gravitational constant used. Participants note the importance of precision in calculations, as small errors can significantly affect results. There is skepticism about the bullet's ability to pass through a 1.5 kg block without losing more velocity. Overall, the analysis is deemed correct, but the physical feasibility of the scenario is questioned.
danielamartins
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There's a stationary block (m1=1,5kg) in a table (Coefficient of Friction=0,4). A bullet passes through the block and hits a person. The block moved 1,2m. Calculate the velocity of the bullet (mb=0,0079kg and vib=709,88m/s) when it hit the person.


Homework Equations


W(f) = ΔKE

Pix=Px

The Attempt at a Solution



W(f) = ΔKE

v1 - velocity of the block after being hit by the bullet
μ - coefficient of friction = 0,4
d - distance - 1,2 m

- m1×g×μ×d=0- 1/2×m1×v1^2

v1= 3.098 m/s

Then, mb= 0,0079kg and vib=709,88 m/s:
By conservation of momentum:
Pix=Px
p(ix,b)+p(ix,1)= p(x,b)+ p(x,1)
mb×vib+m1×vi1=mb×vb+m1×v1

vb= 121,65 m/s

So, basically, this is what I did. I had to make up the values for the mass of the block and for the distance it traveled.
The thing is, is this analysis right? Because slowing down that much after passing through a block of wood doesn't seem right. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

Your work looks correct to me.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks! I appreciate it ;)
 
I assume you're using g = 10 ms^-2. I get 121.58 ms^-1.
 
Yes, I'm using g=10m/s^2
 
Since the given data are expressed to several significant figures, I would use a more precise value for g. The calculation involves taking the difference of two large numbers to obtain a rather smaller one, so a small error in an input can produce a relatively large error in the result. With g = 9.8 ms-2 I get 127.5m/s.
The answer could indeed be that low. A bullet might not go right through a 1.5kg block of wood.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top