Calc % Ag in Alloy: 0.6353g Ag2/ 0.5000g alloy x 100% = 12.9%

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the percentage of silver in a copper-silver alloy, the total mass of the solid sulfides (0.7300 grams) is used to determine the mass of silver. The calculations involve converting the mass of Ag2S to moles and then to grams of silver, resulting in 0.6353 grams of silver. The percentage of silver in the alloy is then calculated using the formula: (mass of Ag/mass of alloy) x 100%, yielding 12.9%. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in the initial steps of the calculation and confirms the correctness of the approach taken. The final answer is that the alloy contains 12.9% silver.
orchidee7
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An alloy of copper and silver weighing 0.5000 grams is dissolved in HNO3 and treated with H2S to precipitate both CuS and Ag2S. It is found that the solid sulphides weigh 0.7300 grams. Calculate the percentage of Ag in the alloy. (12.9 %)

2Ag+(aq) + H2S(aq)→ Ag2S(s) + 2H+(aq)
Cu+2(aq) + H2S(aq)→ CuS(s) + 2H+(aq)

Homework Equations


mass of Ag/mass of alloy = % of Ag

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not too sure how to start this question…

So far, I have

0.7300 g Ag2S x 1 mol / 215.74 g Ag2
= 2.945 x 10-3 mol Ag2S

2.945 x 10-3 mol Ag2S x 215.74 g Ag2/ 1 mol Ag2S
= 0.6353 g Ag2I'm not sure if I'm on the right track here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a system of two equations in two unknowns.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
69
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
8K
Back
Top