Calculate Change in Momentum of Mass m Launched at 45° Angle

Victorian91
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object of mass m is launched at speed v from point P on horizontal ground at an angle of elevation of 45 degrees, as shown in the picture. When the object reaches point Q the magnitude of the change in momentum of the object is ?


Homework Equations


Change in momentum of the object
mv - mu


The Attempt at a Solution


Honestly, I really don't know how to start
All i know is use the formula of the change of momentum
But then the angle 45 degrees I really don't know where to put..
Can somebody help me

Sorry for not attempting
Is because I am a bit blur..
Lastly the options for this question is

A : Zero
B : 1/2 mv
C : 2mv
D : 4mv

Thanks so much..
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    5 KB · Views: 418
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay i think I might be able to solve it..
Finally I manage to attempt this question..

Initial velocity, v = ( vcos45 )^2 + ( vsin45 )^2 ( using pythagorean theorum ) ( to find the resultant velocity
Therefore initial velocity = v
Hence, initial momentum, p =mv

Final velocity, v is the same in magnitude but opposite direction,
Hence final momentum, p =-mv

Hence, change in momentum,
is -mv -mv

=-2mv

But the question just wants the magnitude,
Hence = 2mv

Can anybody tell me whether my working is correct??
Thanks
 
Victorian91 said:
Final velocity, v is the same in magnitude but opposite direction,

Really? Why do you think that?

Also, momentum is a vector:

\Delta\vec{p}=\vec{p}_f}-\vec{p}_i=m\vec{v}_f}-m\vec{v}_i

What force is causing the momentum to change? Which direction does this force act in? Hence, which component(s) of the momentum change?
 
The final velocity of the object will be pointing downwards..
Hence, the it will be the same magnitude as the initial velocity but pointing downwards..

That is what I think..

Is my answer correct?
Or are there any other answers..

Thanks
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top