Calculate Charge on Each Sphere: Force and Total Charge Given

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmb07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Force
AI Thread Summary
To determine the charge on each of the two metal spheres with a total charge of 6.63E-6 C and a repulsive force of 26.9 N when 6 cm apart, the force equation F = (k * q1 * q2) / r^2 can be used. By substituting q1 with (6.63E-6 - q2), the equation simplifies to F = k * (6.63E-6 - q2) * q2 / r^2, allowing for the calculation of q2. The resulting equation is quadratic in form, indicating that the quadratic formula may be necessary to solve for q2. Once q2 is found, q1 can be easily calculated as the difference from the total charge. This approach effectively reduces the problem to a single variable equation.
jmb07
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
total charge of 6.63E-6 C distributed on 2 metal spheres. When the spheres are 6 cm apart, they each feel a repulsive force of 26.9 N. How much charge is on each sphere??

I know that F=(k x q1 x q2)/(r x r)

Im not exactly how to solve for these when i don't know either one of them to solve for one another. How should i go about this??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the fact that q1+q2=6.63E-6. Use it as your second equation.
 
how would i relate q1 to q2? Like i understand that the two added together is the total charge.
Should i say that q2 = (F rxr)/(k x q1)
and q1 = 6.63E-6 - q2

I try plugging the relations in but i can't seem to put it all together for some reason
 
If
Q_1+Q_2=6.63e^{-6},

then
Q_1=6.63e^{-6} - Q_2

Substituting that back into your Force equation:

F=k\frac{(Q_1)(Q_2)}{r^2}

F=k\frac{(6.63e^{-6} - Q_2)(Q_2)}{r^2}

Solve for Q_2. In this way, you have used the value of Q2 to state the value of Q1 and your equation is then only dependent on the one variable, Q2, instead of two. After finding Q2, you should be able to figure out Q1 in one step.
 
thanks! I think i am having an algebra block though haha. So,
(6.63E-6 - q2)(q2) = (Frxr)/k

Do i need to use the quadratic equation to solve for q2 or is there a more simple way i am missing?
 
It appears to be unavoidable. It's not exactly difficult =)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top