Calculate Electric Field E at Point (0,0,h) & Maximum Value at h=b/2^1/2

  • Thread starter Thread starter bennyngreal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Field
bennyngreal
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
A line charge of uniform charge density lambda forms a circle of radius b that lies in the x-y plane with its centre at the origin.
a)Find the electric field E at the point (0,0,h).
b)At what value of h will E in parta) be a maximum?What is this maximum?

ans:
a)E=人hb/(2e0(h^2+b^2)^1/2 >k(direction of K)
b)h=b/2^1/2 ; Emax=人/(3^3/2*e0*b)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have the answers, what is the problem?
 
the method how to do it
 
I think using the equation for an electric field due to a line charge is a good place to start:

<br /> \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int_\mathcal{P}\frac{\lambda(\mathbf{r}&#039;)}{\mathcal{R}^2}\hat{\mathbf{\mathcal{R}}}dl&#039;<br />

Fortunately for you, the line charge is of a uniform density, so this can be reduced to

<br /> \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})=\frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int_\mathcal{P}\frac{1}{\mathcal{R}^2}\hat{\mathbf{\mathcal{R}}}dl&#039;<br />

What can you tell me about \mathcal{R}--the separation length--and \hat{\mathbf{\mathcal{R}}}--the separation vector?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top