Calculate Energy Needed for Flexinol Contraction in Vacuum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jai Sankar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heating Vacuum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy required for a flexinol wire contraction under specific conditions. The wire has a resistance of 0.33 ohms and requires 4000mA for one second, leading to a power dissipation of approximately 13.2 Watts. It is noted that heating the wire in a vacuum versus air may not significantly affect power consumption due to minimal convection effects over a short duration. However, heat loss calculations involve both convective and radiative components, with the latter being less affected by the medium. The conversation emphasizes the importance of iterative temperature estimations to balance heat loss with electrical power input for accurate modeling.
Jai Sankar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a flexinol wire, and it has a resistance of 0.11 ohms/inch and it requires 4000mA for a 1 second contraction. I was wondering how much energy was required for a 1 second contraction and if I were to heat the flexinol under a vacuum, how much less energy would be required. The flexinol is a cylinder with a radius of 0.020 in and is 3 inches long, a density of 0.235 lb/in^3, and a specific heat of 0.2 cal/g * °C.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
(1)

You have 3 inches of wire so total resistance is 0.33 ohms . Current is 4 Amps .

Power dissipated by a resistance is given by I2R Watts .

One Watt = One Joule / second - so how many Joules are needed for a 1 second ON time ?

(2)

Another calculation could tell you what voltage and Amp-Hour capacity a battery would need to be to supply required current and to give the required number of seconds ON time for your application .

(3)

I don't think that having wire in vacuum as opposed to air would make much difference to power consumption .

nb: Flexinol
 
Last edited:
How much heat would be lost to air rather than a vacuum?
 
Paint it flat black and energy loss is greater, polish it like a mirror, energy loss would be less. Infrared radiates pretty close to equally well in air or in a vacuum. Air does add a convection component, but for 1 second isn't long enough to establish any significant convection current.
 
Jai Sankar said:
How much heat would be lost to air rather than a vacuum?
in a vacuum it will do it's thing slower because the heat can escape the boundary layer faster. the air-to-wire boundary layer is like "R" in thermal insulation equations, thus heat will escape slower so temp will rise faster.
 
Natural convection is a tricky subject, but for a simple geometry like a wire in free air you can make some assumptions to make calculations a bit more manageable.

Your governing equations for heat loss per unit length would be:
  1. Convective Heat Loss: q'_c = \bar hπD(T_s - T_∞)
  2. Radiation heat Loss: q'_r = επDσ(T_s^4 - T_∞^4)
  • q'_c - Convective heat loss
  • q'_r - Radiative heat loss
  • \bar h - Convective coefficient
  • D - Wire diameter
  • ε - Wire emissivity
  • σ - Stefan-Boltzmann constant
  • T_s - Wire temperature
  • T_∞ - Environment temperature
The dimensionless parameters used in the calculation of natural convection are where it gets a little tricky. You're looking for the convective coefficient but it depends on the temperature, so to start you'll guess a temperature and then calculate out the convective coefficient. You can follow an iterative process for estimating steady state temperature until you're able to balance heat loss with power input. So (guess temperature) → (calculate heat loss) → (compare to electrical power put in) → (repeat step 1).

To get the convective coefficient follow these steps:
  1. Calculate Rayleigh number: Ra_{D}=\frac{g\beta\left(T_{s}-T_{inf}\right)D^{3}}{\nu\alpha}
  2. Calculate Nusselt number: \overline{Nu}_{D}=\left\{0.60+\frac{0.387Ra_{D}^{1/6}}{\left[1+\left(0.559/Pr\right)^{9/16}\right]^{8/27}}\right\}^{2}
  3. Calculate convective coeffcient: \overline{h}=\frac{k}{D}\overline{Nu}_{D}
where:
  • \beta=1/T_{s}
  • Prandtl number: Pr = \frac{ν}{α} (ratio of the kinematic viscosity and thermal diffusivity of air)
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top