MHB Calculate Flexibility of Budget Distribution: 10 & 90 vs. 50 & 50

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating budget flexibility between two different distribution scenarios: a fixed budget of $50 for gas and $50 for entertainment versus a more flexible budget of $10 for gas and $90 for either category. The key question is how to quantify the efficiency gained from the flexible budget, as it allows for better allocation of funds based on needs. Participants emphasize the importance of defining the problem clearly to facilitate meaningful calculations. Ultimately, the goal is to determine the percentage increase in efficiency when using the flexible budget compared to the fixed one.
clock245
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I think this is an obvious answer, but maybe I'm dense!

So not sure if this belongs in this sub-group, but let me explain my question below

Say I have a budget of $\$ 50$ for gas and $\$50$ for entertainment. I cannot cross between those two pots. So even though i have $\$ 100$ i′ve got 50% flex in terms of efficiently using my dollars.

So slightly more complicated what if i now had $\$ 10$ for gas and $\$ 90$ that could be used for gas OR entertainment? It's not really 50% flex because i am able to use my dollars more efficiently now.

How do i calculate this in a meaningful way? In other words i am X% more efficient in the $\$ 90$ and $\$ 10$ distribution vs the $\$ 50$ and $\$ 50$ distribution.

Thanks for any help you can provide.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
clock245 said:
How do i calculate this in a meaningful way?
We can only help if you state your problem in a meaningful way...
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top