Calculate Fringe Separation in Fabry-Perot Etalon

  • Thread starter Thread starter janrain
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the plate separation of a Fabry-Perot etalon used in a spectrometer, where one half of the slit is illuminated with mercury light and the other with white light. Observations indicate 20 fringes in the continuous spectrum within the wavelength range of 4000 to 5000 angstroms, suggesting multiple wavelengths achieve constructive interference. Participants emphasize the need to understand the relationship between fringe count and wavelength to derive the necessary formula for plate separation. It is noted that the setup likely involves an air gap between two plates, and the assumption of a small angle can simplify calculations. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the guidance provided.
janrain
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
problem:
in a spectrometer, one half of the slit is illuminated with mercury light and 2nd half illuminated with white light through a fabry-perot etalon. in the wavelength range of 4000 to 5000 angstorm , 20 fringes are observed in the continuous spectrum.
calculate the plate separation of the fabry perot etalon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=4825
 
i don't know how to proceed. don't know the formula/what needs to be done to derive it.
 
janrain said:
i don't know how to proceed. don't know the formula/what needs to be done to derive it.

Read the section on the Fabry-Perot Etalon here

http://electron9.phys.utk.edu/optics421/modules/m5/Interferometers.htm

Save this link for a nice basic description of other interferometers.

The problem is telling you that there are 20 different wavelengths between 4000 and 5000 angstroms that will give constructive interference. It sounds like your case has and air gap between two plates, and you can assume very small angle.
 
thanks a lot. that helped.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top