Calculate Gamma Distribution: 5% at $627, 95% at $1444

  • Thread starter Thread starter euler_fan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution Gamma
euler_fan
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
On the included link, it is calculated that 5% of payouts are around $627 and 95% of payouts are at $1444. I would appreciate if someone can direct me as to how the came up with this answer.

http://www.brighton-webs.co.uk/distributions/gamma.asp"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First off they use "less than" and "greater than", not "equal". Those are the limits of the payouts. In general, the F(x) or CDF or Cumulative Probability function takes as an input a number x (payout) along with the distribution parameters, shape, and scale. It returns a percentage as an answer such that y percent of things (payouts) will be less than x.

Now to go the other way you need the inverse CDF function. You feed it a percentage, y, and it returns x (payout amount). Usually this is done with a tabulated chart of values or a computer/calculator function.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top