Calculate Instantaneous Velocity at t=2s

AI Thread Summary
To calculate instantaneous velocity at t=2s, finding the slope of the tangent line is essential. The initial attempt yielded a slope of 3.66, while the expected answer is 3.8. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately determining the tangent's intercepts on the axes, suggesting that a more precise estimation could lead to a better result. It is noted that the values used in calculations significantly impact the outcome, and relying solely on visual estimation may not yield the most accurate answer. Overall, refining the method of determining the tangent line's slope is crucial for achieving the correct instantaneous velocity.
Biscuit
Messages
60
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to find the slope of the tangent line, but this gave me 3.66 and the answer is 3.8 how do I find this?
 

Attachments

  • position vs time.png
    position vs time.png
    6 KB · Views: 600
Physics news on Phys.org
First, for the graph you've given us, I don't think you could be expected to do any better.

Second, but what numbers did you use? It looks like your tangent crosses the time axis at 3.5sec and the distance axis at over 13, so 13/3.5 = 3.71 should be lower than your answer? Their suggestion of 3.8 looks like 13.3/3.5 and I can estimate the distance intercept between13.26 and 13.33 or even 13.4 (a pixel or two on my copy!)
 
Merlin3189 said:
First, for the graph you've given us, I don't think you could be expected to do any better.

Second, but what numbers did you use? It looks like your tangent crosses the time axis at 3.5sec and the distance axis at over 13, so 13/3.5 = 3.71 should be lower than your answer? Their suggestion of 3.8 looks like 13.3/3.5 and I can estimate the distance intercept between13.26 and 13.33 or even 13.4 (a pixel or two on my copy!)
your copy is as good as mine I forget the exact numbers I used but I was hoping there would be a different way to go about it other than eyeballing it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top