Does Instantaneous Velocity Account for Launch Height in Kinematics?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of instantaneous velocity in the context of kinematics, particularly focusing on how launch height affects the velocity of an object when it hits the ground. Participants are exploring the implications of initial height on the velocity of falling objects, with references to both classical mechanics and special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning how the initial height of an object influences its instantaneous velocity upon reaching the ground. There is a discussion about the mathematical representation of height and velocity, particularly the role of the y0 term in the height equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants are clarifying their understanding of the relationship between height and velocity, noting that while the y0 term drops out in calculations, the time taken to reach a final height differs for objects launched from different heights. There is acknowledgment of confusion regarding the application of special relativity in this context, with some expressing stress over the assignment material.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that they have not yet covered special relativity in their coursework and are currently focused on dimensionless analysis and kinematics formulas. There is a sense of uncertainty about the material being taught and its application to the assignment.

starstruck_
Messages
185
Reaction score
8
<Moderator's note: Split from another thread and thus no template.>
I am working on my special relativity assignment right now, and it said to find the velocity of an object when it hits the ground. The height the object is launched at is > 0.

Question: comparing that velocity to the instantaneous velocity, does the instantaneous velocity not account for the fact that an object would have a higher velocity at a given point if it’s launched from a greater height?

Say you had two objects whose height can be modeled by the function y(t) = y0+ by-0.5gt^2

When you find the instantaneous velocity, the y0 term disappears. However, we know that the velocity of an object would be greater if it has a greater height.

What’s the difference here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
starstruck_ said:
<Moderator's note: Split from another thread and thus no template.>
I am working on my special relativity assignment right now, and it said to find the velocity of an object when it hits the ground. The height the object is launched at is > 0.

Question: comparing that velocity to the instantaneous velocity, does the instantaneous velocity not account for the fact that an object would have a higher velocity at a given point if it’s launched from a greater height?

Say you had two objects whose height can be modeled by the function y(t) = y0+ by-0.5gt^2

When you find the instantaneous velocity, the y0 term disappears. However, we know that the velocity of an object would be greater if it has a greater height.

What’s the difference here?
The question is a bit confused. If I understand correctly, you are considering two objects dropped from a certain initial height and on which only gravity is acting? And you are asking about the instantaneous velocity when they have reached some final height yf, right?

You are right that yo drops out, but the key point is that the time that the will have taken for each object will be different. For the one dropped from a larger height, the time taken to reach the final position yf will be larger. That's why the velocity will be larger for that object.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: starstruck_
nrqed said:
The question is a bit confused. If I understand correctly, you are considering two objects dropped from a certain initial height and on which only gravity is acting? And you are asking about the instantaneous velocity when they have reached some final height yf, right?

You are right that yo drops out, but the key point is that the time that the will have taken for each object will be different. For the one dropped from a larger height, the time taken to reach the final position yf will be larger. That's why the velocity will be larger for that object.

Thank you! That’s what I reasoned out before I confused my self.

This assignment just has me stressed out, I didn’t learn anything in this class, it’s so hard to follow what he’s doing and now I have to do dimensionless analysis all of a sudden. Oof
 
starstruck_ said:
Thank you! That’s what I reasoned out before I confused my self.

This assignment just has me stressed out, I didn’t learn anything in this class, it’s so hard to follow what he’s doing and now I have to do dimensionless analysis all of a sudden. Oof
You are welcome. Although I am a bit puzzled since you mention SR in your title but the formula you use is non relativistic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: starstruck_
nrqed said:
You are welcome. Although I am a bit puzzled since you mention SR in your title but the formula you use is non relativistic.

We haven’t started actual SR yet, we’ve been doing dimensionless analysis to go from the Galilean theory to the Newtonian theory over the past 3 weeks (and I absolutely do not understand anything, or at least I didn’t until I worked my way through part of this assignment).

EDIT: it’s just practice with kinematics formulas we already know
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nrqed
starstruck_ said:
We haven’t started actual SR yet, we’ve been doing dimensionless analysis to go from the Galilean theory to the Newtonian theory over the past 3 weeks (and I absolutely do not understand anything, or at least I didn’t until I worked my way through part of this assignment).

EDIT: it’s just practice with kinematics formulas we already know
Ah ok, that makes sense now :-) Best luck. And don't hesitate to ask questions here!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K