Calculate Magnitude of Force Exerted on q1 by q3 & Horiz. Comp.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Magnitude
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force exerted on charge q1 by charge q3, using the formula F = q1q2 / 4πEor^2. The calculated force is approximately 7.63 N, with a horizontal component of 5.39 N. There is confusion regarding the resultant force when q1 is replaced with a charge of -4*10^-6 C, as the sign of the charges affects the force's direction. Participants clarify that the signs of the charges must be included in calculations, and vector addition should be used to find the resultant force from multiple charges. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying charge values and their signs in calculations.
Bama
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Ok, here is what I have. See attachment to complete the problem.

What is the magnitude of force exerted on charge q1 by charge q3 and horizontal component of force exerted?

Formula: q1q2 / 4piEor^2

Part 1) (4*10^-6)(2.12*10^-6) / 12.56 (8.85*10^-12)(1*10^-2) = 7.628917917176 N or Rounded off as 7.63N

Part 2) 7.63 N sin 135 degrees = 5.39 N

Now I understand the above, howver what I can understand is the following. The resultant force exerted on the charge q1 by the other 3 charges is what? But what if we replaced q1 with charge -4*10^-6, what resultant force would be exerted by the other 3 charges?
 

Attachments

  • Q1 & q2.JPG
    Q1 & q2.JPG
    17.7 KB · Views: 524
Physics news on Phys.org
For part 1, your answer should be negative since the force is attractive. As for part 2, calculate the vector forces exerted by all the other charges and sum them all up to find the resultant force. If q1 is replaced by a -4*10^-6 C, then the partial forces you calculated to find the resultant force should all change signs.
 
Corneo if my answer suppose to be negative by force of attractive, than I am confused. The choices that I have doesn't have a negative solution at all. So is my equation set up incorrctly and if so, how should it be set up?
 
Your formula is correct but you forgot to inclue the sign of q3 in your calculation.

Recall that the electrical force between two charges is given by:
F = \frac {1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac {Q_1Q_2}{r^2}

So for part 1) Q1 = 4x10^-6 C and Q2 = -2.12x10^-6 C.

Perhaps the choices for the possible solutions are wrong. Unless the question meant the unsigned magnitude of the force.
 
The original question is follow. "What is the magnitude of force exerted on charge q1 by charge q2?

choices: 1) 0 N 3) 3.77 N 5) 7.63 N
2) 0.108 N 4) 5.39 N 6) 10.8 N

The question I am confused about is : "What is the resultant force exerted on charge q1, by the other 3 charges? ( Hint: Note angles carefully)." It also states to selected my answer from one of the above choices.

Also you have Q2 as equaling -2.12x10^-6 C, but as I look at the image only q3 and q4 is eqaul to -2.12x10^-6 C and q2 is equal to -3 x 10^-6. Am I mis-understanding what you meant for your Q2 above?
 
Well I used Q_1 \text{ and } Q_2 as variables in general for the formula. Applied in this case, Q_1 = q_1 and Q_2 = q_3. To answer you last question you can use vector addition to find the resultant force. The formula is

\vec F = \frac {1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac {Q_1Q_2}{r^2} {\vec r}

However you could also just calculate the magnitudes of each force exerted on q1, then calculate the components of each vector and sum them all up.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top