Calculate Mass Percent: HNO3 in Sample

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ki-nana18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Percent
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass percent of HNO3 in the sample, first determine the moles of NaOH and AgNO3 used in the titrations. The moles of NaOH can be calculated using its molarity and volume, while the moles of AgNO3 can be derived similarly. Next, establish the stoichiometry of the reactions involving HCl and HNO3 to find the total moles of acid present. Finally, use the moles of HNO3 and its molar mass to calculate the mass percent of HNO3 in the sample. This process involves careful stoichiometric calculations based on the titration data provided.
Ki-nana18
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sample conaining both HCl and HNO3 had a density of 1.083g/ml. A 43.00 ml amount of this sample required 29.09 ml of 0.2828 M NaOH for titration. Another 43.00 ml amount of this sample required 7.88 ml of 0.1505 M AgNO3 for titration. Calculate the mass percent of HNO3 (molar mass = 63.018 g/mol) in the sample.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that you have to calculate the total number of mols of acid, but I'm not where to even start to do that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with writing all reaction equations. Three of them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top