Calculate Max Wavelength of Sound Emitted by Loudspeakers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peter G.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
AI Thread Summary
The observer experiences destructive interference between two loudspeakers, leading to a point of no sound 2 meters from the midpoint where sound is loudest. The calculation suggests a maximum wavelength of 4 meters based on the distance of destructive interference. However, the correct maximum wavelength is 8 meters, as the wavelength of the traveling waves that create the standing wave pattern is double that of the standing wave itself. The confusion arises from a lack of understanding of standing waves, which the textbook assumes the reader has prior knowledge of. This highlights the importance of understanding wave behavior in acoustics.
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Two loudspeakers are connected to the same audio oscillator. An observer walks in between them. At a point M, halfway between the speakers he hears a loud sound. By the time he gets to a point P 2m away from M he hears no sound at all. Calculate the maximum wavelength of sound emitted by the loudspeakers.

This is what I did:
If 2 m there is no sound at all, there is destructive interference, hence: (n + 1/2) λ = 2.

The maximum wavelength would be equal to 4, but the book says 8 m. How?

Thanks,
Peter G.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter G. said:
Hi,

Two loudspeakers are connected to the same audio oscillator. An observer walks in between them. At a point M, halfway between the speakers he hears a loud sound. By the time he gets to a point P 2m away from M he hears no sound at all. Calculate the maximum wavelength of sound emitted by the loudspeakers.

This is what I did:
If 2 m there is no sound at all, there is destructive interference, hence: (n + 1/2) λ = 2.

The maximum wavelength would be equal to 4, but the book says 8 m. How?

Thanks,
Peter G.

In between the speakers, you have a standing wave pattern, and indeed the 4m is the wavelength of the standing wave pattern, however the wavelength of the traveling waves that caused the Standing wave pattern is twice as long as the standing wave.
 
Oh, ok. I haven't studied Standing Waves yet and the exercise is before that part, but maybe the book assumed I had that knowledge.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top