I Calculate Revival Time of a Wave in Griffiths' QM 2nd Ed.

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Abhishek11235
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the revival time of a wave in Griffiths' Quantum Mechanics, using two methods that yield different results. Method 1 calculates the time period of oscillation based on energy and amplitude, while Method 2 uses average velocity to derive the revival time. The correct revival time is confirmed to be from Method 2, which aligns with Griffiths' problem statement regarding quantum revival time. It is noted that Method 1 incorrectly applies a harmonic oscillator potential instead of the infinite square well potential. The key takeaway emphasizes the importance of using appropriate models and checking algebraic dimensions in quantum mechanics calculations.
Abhishek11235
Messages
174
Reaction score
39
In Griffiths,Quantum Mechanics 2nd edition,Chapter 2,he gives a problem to calculate the revival time of a wave. Revival time is defined as the time taken by a wave to go from one side(x=0) to other side(x=a). Now let's calculate the revival time with 2 methods.

Method 1:

Now to go from 1 position to other and coming back to same place is 1 oscillation. The time period of Oscillation is:
$$T= 2π/\omega $$
We have $$E= 1/2 ka^2$$ where E is energy and a is width or amplitude. Since $$k=m(\omega)^2$$ we have after substituting in energy equation and then in the Equation for time period we find:
$$T= \sqrt{2m/E}×a×π$$

Method 2:

Now,by defination,the particle covers distance 2a with average velocity v given by:

$$v=\sqrt{2E/m}$$

So ##vT=2a## gives
$$T= a\sqrt{2E/m}$$

The question is why the above 2 methods give different result?

After checking solution manual,I found method 2 answer to be correct.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem in Griffiths (2.39) states "Show that the wave function of a particle in the infinite square well returns to its original form after a quantum revival time ##T=4ma^2/\pi\hbar##. That is ##\Psi(x,T)=\Psi(x,0)## for any state, (not just a stationary state)." I assume you are interested in part (b) which asks "What is the classical revival time, for a particle of energy E bouncing back and forth between the walls?" Well, your method 2 doesn't have the correct dimensions for ##T##. Check your algebra. Your method 1 has the energy expression ##E=1/2ka^2##. What is ##k##? If it's some kind of spring constant, note that the potential is a box with infinite walls not a harmonic oscillator potential.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes BvU and Abhishek11235
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top