Calculate Rotational Energy of Ship's Anchor: 5000 N Weight

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the rotational energy of a ship's anchor weighing 5000 N, which is connected to a hollow cylindrical drum. Participants clarify that the kinetic energy formula used assumes the angular velocity (ω) of the drum and the linear velocity (v) of the anchor are related through the radius (R) of the cylinder. It is emphasized that while the anchor's velocity changes as it falls, the relationship between the linear speed of the anchor and the tangential speed of the cylinder remains constant. The cable's tangential contact with the cylinder ensures that the speeds are equal, reinforcing the connection between linear and rotational motion. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving similar physics problems.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
60. A ship’s anchor weighs 5000 N. Its cable passes over a roller of negligible mass and is wound around a hollow cylindrical drum of mass 380 kg and radius 1.1 m, mounted on a frictionless axle. The anchor is released and drops 16 m to the water. Use energy considerations to determine the drum’s rotation rate when the an- chor hits the water. Neglect the cable’s mass.

Solution:

MtvmS2Q.png


Under "Evaluate" they say the kinetic energy of the anchor is 1/2m(ωR)2 but why do we assume R to be the radius of the cylinder and why do we consider the angular velocity of both the cylinder and anchor to be the same? Why can't the angular velocities be different? I may be visualizing it incorrectly, but I am slightly confused on why we assume R and ω to be the same for both the anchor and cylinder when they are not even in contact anymore.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MathewsMD! :smile:
MathewsMD said:
60. A ship’s anchor weighs 5000 N. Its cable passes over a roller of negligible mass and is wound around a hollow cylindrical drum of mass 380 kg and radius 1.1 m, mounted on a frictionless axle. The anchor is released and drops 16 m to the water.

Under "Evaluate" they say the kinetic energy of the anchor is 1/2m(ωR)2 but why do we assume R to be the radius of the cylinder and why do we consider the angular velocity of both the cylinder and anchor to be the same?

no, they aren't interested in the angular velocity of the anchor, only its actual velocity, v …

if you think about it, v must equal ωr whatever the angle that the cable makes! :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi MathewsMD! :smile:


no, they aren't interested in the angular velocity of the anchor, only its actual velocity, v …

if you think about it, v must equal ωr whatever the angle that the cable makes! :wink:

Hmmm...Well r would be different, wouldn't it? I can kind of understand how ω would be the same, but wouldn't it change as it is falling? If anyone could provide a more in-depth explanation that would be great!
 
The tangential speed of the rotating cylinder is ωr, where ω is the angular velocity of the cylinder and r is the cylinder radius.

The cable meets the cylinder tangentially. Thus the cable speed is equal to the tangential speed of the cylinder.

This is an important relationship that will come up quite often where you need to relate a linear speed or acceleration to a rotational speed or rotation.
 
yup …

forget about ω changing, it's only v (of the anchor) that we're interested in …

and v of the anchor = v of the rim :wink:
MathewsMD said:
… how ω would be the same, but wouldn't it change as it is falling?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top