Calculate the lattice constant of caesium chloride

  • Thread starter Thread starter fabsuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Lattice
fabsuk
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Calculate the lattice constant of caesium chloride with ionic radii Cs+ 0.167nm and cl- is 0.181 nm

I don't really get it,
from all the structures i have seen the distance between one atom and the next is (a) or (a/2)
but i don't think I am right.Any ideas. What is the difference between the radii (what do they correspond to.

Wouldnt you just add them together.
I think Iam supposed to do some sort of pythagoras but i don't know why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found an equation that might apply but don't know if its right or why its right

2(r + R)/√3


Where the r's correspond to the different radii
 
Hi Fabsuk,

I know this answer is a little late in coming, but I only came across your post now. The reason I only came across it now is because I'm having problems with a similar problem.

The CsCl lattice constant is just the edge length of its conventional unit cell (a BCC structure), that is, the distance between the centers of the Cl atoms on two adjacent corners.

The two radii add up to the distance between the centers of a Cl atom at the corner and the Cs atom in the center of the BCC structure. It is the therefore the distance between a corner and the center of the BCC structure.

You could use either Pythagoras or trigonometry to relate the length of a body diagonal (2 x sum of the two radii given) to the edge length, i.e., the lattice constant, in order to calculate it.

Hope this helps.

Wynand.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top