Calculate the ratio of the Fermi wavevector to the radius of the largest sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of the Fermi wavevector to the radius of the largest sphere inscribed in the first Brillouin zone for sodium, a monovalent free-electron metal with a body-centered cubic structure. The ratio is determined to be √(2/π):1, and the Fermi energy is calculated to be approximately 5.09 × 10^-19 J using the given cubic cell side of 0.4225 nm. Additionally, the change in Fermi energy per degree rise in temperature is derived, resulting in a value of -1.81 × 10^-23 J/K. The calculations involve applying principles of solid-state physics, including the relationships between the Fermi wavevector, energy, and thermal expansion. The thread emphasizes the importance of accurate mathematical derivations in understanding material properties.
blueyellow

Homework Statement



Sodium is, to a good approximation, a monovalent free-electron metal which has the
body-centred cubic structure.
(a) Calculate the ratio of the Fermi wavevector to the radius of the largest sphere that
can be inscribed in the first Brillouin zone. Remember that the reciprocal lattice of bcc
is fcc, and that the Brillouin zone is the cell formed in reciprocal space by the bisector
planes of the vectors from the origin to every reciprocal lattice point.
(b) If the cubic cell side of Sodium is 0.4225 nm, calculate its Fermi energy.
(c) Calculate the change in the Fermi energy of Sodium per degree temperature rise if
its linear thermal expansion coefficient is \alpha= 7 × 10^{-5} K^{-1}.
(The linear thermal expansion coefficient is related to the lattice parameter, a, by
\frac{da}{dT}=\alphaa)

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Fermi wavevector:
k_{F}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}(\frac{\pi}{a})

r=\frac{\pi}{a}

so the ratio is \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}:1

Is it really as simple as that or have I done something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
b) Fermi energy:E_{F}=\frac{h^{2}}{2m}k_{F}^{2}k_{F}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}(\frac{\pi}{a})E_{F}=\frac{h^{2}}{2m}(\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}(\frac{\pi}{a}))^{2}E_{F}=\frac{h^{2}}{2m}\frac{4}{\pi a^{2}}a=0.4225 nmE_{F}=\frac{h^{2}}{2m}\frac{4}{\pi(0.4225nm)^{2}}E_{F}= 5.09 × 10^{-19} Jc) \frac{dE_{F}}{dT}=\frac{\partial E_{F}}{\partial a}\frac{da}{dT}\frac{\partial E_{F}}{\partial a}= -\frac{8h^{2}}{\pi m a^{3}}\frac{da}{dT}= \alpha aso \frac{dE_{F}}{dT}= -\frac{8h^{2} \alpha a^{2}}{\pi m a^{3}}dE_{F}= -\frac{8h^{2} \alpha a^{2}}{\pi m a^{3}} dTdE_{F}= -\frac{8h^{2} \alpha a}{\pi m } dTdE_{F}= -1.81 × 10^{-23} JK^{-1} dT
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top