Calculate the velocity of a body with twice the mass to have the same KE

In summary: No, your way is significantly different.In summary, you must have the mass and velocity of the original body in order to solve this exercise.
  • #1
Richie Smash
293
15

Homework Statement


A body of mass m, moves with a velocity v, and has a certain kinetic energy. What velocity would a body of twice the mass have to move to have the same kinetic energy.

Homework Equations


K.E=1/2mv2

The Attempt at a Solution


I made an equation
2m1/2*v12/2= m2v22/2

from here I was able to calculate that
v22=√v12/4
so v2=v/2I believe it would have to be moving at half the speed no?

But I don't know how to formulate an answer.

The correct answer is hard to describe, so I'll post a picture.

What is that symbol? I'm just copying what I see in my book, but it might just be how it comes out in print but I think it means v/(squareroot of 2)

And if so I'm thoroughly confused as to how that is the answer.
 

Attachments

  • velocity.png
    velocity.png
    2 KB · Views: 426
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you have two bodies moving at different speeds, it is a good habit to use subscripts to distinguish the masses and the speeds. Try rewriting the equation using m1, v1 for the first mass and m2, v2 for the second mass.
 
  • #3
I've changed it up a bi my answer still is not the correct one, and I don't know what the method is, sigh this is frustrating
 
  • #4
Richie Smash said:
I've changed it up a bi my answer still is not the correct one, and I don't know what the method is, sigh this is frustrating
The equation that you started from does not look right. Start with
KE1 = ½m1v12 and
KE2 = ½m2v22
If body 2 has twice the mass of body 1, how would you say that with an equation?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #5
KE = 1/2(2m1v22)

Which would simplify to KE2=m1v22
 
  • #6
Richie Smash said:
KE = 1/2(2m1v22)

Which would simplify to KE2=m1v22
Now compare that to the KE of the other mass.
 
  • #7
Right so I would do

m1v22= (m1v12)/2

SO

V22= V12/2

V2= V1/√2...

Oh... right... Now I understand :/

Sorry for not seeing the obvious answer :( but thank you.
 
  • #8
Richie Smash said:
Sorry for not seeing the obvious answer :( but thank you.
No need to be sorry. We are happy to help regardless of whether an answer is obvious or requires pages of calculations.

I have gone ahead and marked this thread as solved.
 
  • #9
There is also another way of doing it which is somewhat simpler.

Ec= 2m(1)×v2(2)×½
Ec×2/2×m= v2
Ec/m = v2
v = √Ec/√m
 
Last edited:
  • #10
DLeuPel said:
There is also another way of doing it which is somewhat simpler.

Ec= 2m×v2×½
Ec×2×m/2= v2
Ec×m = v2
v = √Ec/√m
Is this an answer to the original question? When you write Ec= 2m×v2×½, Ec is the KE of the body 2 and v is the speed of body 2 not the given speed v of body 1. So all you have done is push symbols around the equation for the KE of body 2 without finding how the speed of body 2 is related to the speed of body 1.
 
  • #11
kuruman said:
Is this an answer to the original question? When you write Ec= 2m×v2×½, Ec is the KE of the body 2 and v is the speed of body 2 not the given speed v of body 1. So all you have done is push symbols around the equation for the KE of body 2 without finding how the speed of body 2 is related to the speed of body 1.
Ec ( KE of both bodies) =
2xm(1) x v^2 (2) x 1/2
It is an answer to the original question but without having to find the relationship :heart: between them. Although I should have specified what velocities and mases I was talking of.
Good day
 
  • #12
DLeuPel said:
Ec ( KE of both bodies) =
2xm(1) x v^2 (2) x 1/2
It is an answer to the original question but without having to find the relationship :heart: between them. Although I should have specified what velocities and mases I was talking of.
Good day
The entire point of the exercise was to express the velocity of one in the velocity of the other ...
 
  • #13
Orodruin said:
The entire point of the exercise was to express the velocity of one in the velocity of the other ...
That is not stated in the given problem. I just posted another way to solve this exercise in a way which results much more simpler than the method that other users have posted.
 
  • #14
DLeuPel said:
That is not stated in the given problem. I just posted another way to solve this exercise in a way which results much more simpler than the method that other users have posted.
Yes it is. You have the mass and the velocity of the original body.
Richie Smash said:
A body of mass m, moves with a velocity v, and has a certain kinetic energy.
You do not have the kinetic energy. It is just stated that the body will have a particular kinetic energy. Regardless, your way is really no different from what has already been presented in this thread. The only difference is that you have not done the algebra to find the relationship between the velocities.
 
  • #15
Orodruin said:
Yes it is. You have the mass and the velocity of the original body.

You do not have the kinetic energy. It is just stated that the body will have a particular kinetic energy. Regardless, your way is really no different from what has already been presented in this thread. The only difference is that you have not done the algebra to find the relationship between the velocities.
The only thing the problem asks is the v that it would have if the mass would be double. Just read the problem and it answers for itself.
 
  • #16
DLeuPel said:
The only thing the problem asks is the v that it would have if the mass would be double. Just read the problem and it answers for itself.
I am sorry, but it is quite obvious from the problem formulation what the given knowns are and that the kinetic energy is not one of them other than in terms of its expression in the mass and velocity. Besides, as already stated, "your" approach is really no different from what has already been presented here.
 
  • #17
Orodruin said:
I am sorry, but it is quite obvious from the problem formulation what the given knowns are and that the kinetic energy is not one of them other than in terms of its expression in the mass and velocity. Besides, as already stated, "your" approach is really no different from what has already been presented here.
I forgive you
 
  • #18
DLeuPel said:
The only thing the problem asks is the v that it would have if the mass would be double. Just read the problem and it answers for itself.
Physics questions have certain implicit conventions when they are formulated. Some pieces of information are explicitly stated while others are not. For example, in projectile motion problems it is sometimes (but not usually) stated that air resistance is to be ignored. Nevertheless, it is never stated to ignore the Coriolis force due to the Earth's rotation or the gravity pull of the Sun, the Moon and Jupiter. If everything were explicitly stated, physics problems would read like a legal document and students would spend all their time on a test reading the questions instead of thinking how to answer them.

When a question gives you ##a## and ##b## and asks you to find ##x##, then the convention is that you find an expression ##x= ...## that involves only ##a## and ##b## on the right side plus the appropriate constants like ##\pi##, ##g##, etc. If you do not follow this convention on a test question, it will be marked incorrect so be prepared to argue the legal case to your instructor. Good luck.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Orodruin and PeroK

1. How is velocity related to kinetic energy (KE)?

Velocity and KE are directly proportional to each other. This means that as the velocity of a body increases, its KE also increases. Conversely, as the velocity decreases, so does the KE.

2. Can you explain the formula for calculating the velocity of a body with twice the mass to have the same KE?

The formula is v = √(2KE/m). This means that the velocity is equal to the square root of 2 multiplied by the KE and divided by the mass of the body.

3. What is the significance of having twice the mass but the same KE?

This situation demonstrates the concept of conservation of energy, where the total amount of energy in a system remains constant. By doubling the mass, the velocity must decrease in order for the KE to remain the same.

4. How is this calculation useful in real-world applications?

Calculating the velocity of a body with twice the mass to have the same KE is useful in understanding the relationship between mass, velocity, and energy. This can be applied in fields such as engineering, physics, and even sports, where the velocity and mass of objects can greatly impact the amount of energy involved.

5. Can this formula be applied to all types of bodies, regardless of shape or size?

Yes, this formula can be applied to all types of bodies, as long as they have mass and are in motion. It is a universal principle that applies to all objects in the physical world.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
796
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
159
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
785
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
906
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
872
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
937
Back
Top