Calculate time (or fraction of orb. period) of sat. in umbra

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the time a satellite spends in the umbra during a total solar eclipse, one must consider the satellite's circular orbit radius and the Earth's shadow projection. The Earth's shadow forms an isosceles triangle, allowing for the calculation of the angle using simple trigonometry. This angle, when multiplied by the radius, provides the length of the orbit segment in darkness. Dividing this angle by the satellite's mean motion yields the time spent in darkness, while comparing it to the orbital period gives the percentage of the orbit in umbra. For increased accuracy, the conical nature of the Earth's shadow should be considered, although a close approximation is often sufficient for operational planning.
thor36
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Greetings!

I would like to know how to calculate the time, or fraction of orbital period, that a satellite spends in umbra? (total solar eclipse for satellite when they aren't affected by Solar radiation pressure and solar panels don't generate power).

Information given would be satellite's orbit radius from the center of Earth, and orbit would be assumed circular.

Thank you and kind regards,
T
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Your satellite is in a circular orbit, so r (the radius) never changes. The Earth's shadow will project out nearly in straight lines. A straight line from the start of umbra to the end of umbra will equal the Earth's diameter. That, plus the radii for each of those points forms an iscoceles triangle. Some simple trig can get you the angle.

Once you have the angle (in radians), multiply it by the radius to get the length of the portion of the orbit that's in darkness. (optional since there's multiple ways to get what you want)

Divide your angle by your mean motion (average angular velocity) and you have the amount of time spent in darkness.

Comparing the time in darkness to the orbital period, dividing your angle by 2pi, or dividing your distance spent in darkness by the circumference will get you your percentage of the orbit in darkness.

Actually, since the Sun is larger than the Earth, the Earth's shadow is conical, but it's a cone that converges very slowly. If you want more accuracy, you really need to take into account that convergence. In practice, close is good enough - at least from a satellite operations planning point of view. I imagine there could be some scenarios (experiments, etc) where you'd actually need that extra accuracy.
 
Thank you BobG, I believe this will do!
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top