Calculate Y-parameters of a capacitor in parallel

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Y-parameters of a capacitor in parallel, with participants exploring the implications of circuit configurations and the relationships between Y-parameters and Z-parameters. The scope includes theoretical considerations and practical challenges in circuit analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that when attempting to calculate Y-parameters, setting V2 to zero leads to V1 also being zero, suggesting Y11 approaches infinity.
  • Another participant points out that since there is only one essential node in the circuit, V1 equals V2, complicating the calculation of Y-parameters when shorting a port.
  • A participant discusses their approach to finding Z-parameters, stating that Z11 is easily calculated but expresses uncertainty about drawing the circuit correctly for Z12.
  • There is a claim that if Z11 equals Z12, then all Z-parameters are equal to Z11, which is presented as a potential conclusion.
  • One participant raises a concern that since the determinant of the impedance matrix is zero, there are no finite Y-parameters, indicating a fundamental issue with the circuit configuration.
  • Another participant suggests that the circuit is effectively a single port device due to the direct wiring of the two ports.
  • A later post expresses a desire to find the Y-parameter matrix of a Schottky diode working as a mixer, questioning the feasibility of combining Y-matrices and Z-parameters in this context.
  • Another participant advises that showing the larger circuit may help in providing guidance on using two-terminal matrices effectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of calculating Y-parameters in the given configuration, with some asserting that the approach leads to infinite values while others suggest that the circuit's nature complicates the analysis. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct methodology for calculating the Y-parameters.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the circuit configuration, including the implications of having a zero determinant in the impedance matrix and the challenges of accurately representing circuit elements when calculating parameters.

Bromio
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the Y parameters of a capacitor in parallel (see the attached figure).

Homework Equations



Y-Parameters:
I_1=Y_{11}V_1+Y_{12}V_2
I_2=Y_{21}V_1+Y_{22}V_2

Y_{11} = \frac{I_1}{V_1} when V_2=0
Y_{12} = \frac{I_1}{V_2} when V_1=0
Y_{21} = \frac{I_2}{V_1} when V_2=0
Y_{22} = \frac{I_2}{V_2} when V_1=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried to use formulas written above, but when V_2=0, then V_1=0, so Y_{11}\to\infty?

The same happens when I try to find Y-parameters of a resistor in parallel.

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • cparalell.png
    cparalell.png
    552 bytes · Views: 997
Physics news on Phys.org
Since there's only the one essential node in the circuit, V1 = V2 always. So finding the Y-Parameters by shorting a port and expecting the other port to have some voltage other than zero is, well, problematical!

You may have more luck with the Z-Parameters... then consider how the Y-matrix is related to Z-matrix. What conclusions can you draw?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
OK. Thanks.

So,
V_1 = Z_{11}I_1 + Z_{12}I_2
V_2 = Z_{21}I_1 + Z_{22}I_2

I have no problem finding Z_{11}:
Z_{11} = \left.\frac{V_1}{I_1}\right|_{I_2=0} = \frac{1}{j\omega C}

However, when finding Z_{12} I'm not sure if I draw the circuit properly in order to calculate the parameters. I mean I_1=0 and V_1=V_2, so Z_{12} = \left.\frac{V_1}{I_2}\right|_{I_1=0} = \left.\frac{V_2}{I_2}\right|_{I_1=0}= \frac{1}{j\omega C}.

If that's true, all Z-parameters are equal to Z_{11} = \frac{1}{j\omega C}.

Is this correct?

Thanks!
 
Bromio said:
OK. Thanks.

So,
V_1 = Z_{11}I_1 + Z_{12}I_2
V_2 = Z_{21}I_1 + Z_{22}I_2

I have no problem finding Z_{11}:
Z_{11} = \left.\frac{V_1}{I_1}\right|_{I_2=0} = \frac{1}{j\omega C}

However, when finding Z_{12} I'm not sure if I draw the circuit properly in order to calculate the parameters. I mean I_1=0 and V_1=V_2, so Z_{12} = \left.\frac{V_1}{I_2}\right|_{I_1=0} = \left.\frac{V_2}{I_2}\right|_{I_1=0}= \frac{1}{j\omega C}.

If that's true, all Z-parameters are equal to Z_{11} = \frac{1}{j\omega C}.

Is this correct?
Yup.
 
In that case I have the same problem as before.

I know that Y_{11}=\frac{Z_{22}}{\Delta_Z}, where \Delta_Z = Z_{11}Z_{22}-Z_{12}Z_{21}.

Because Z_{11} = Z_{12} = Z_{21} = Z_{22} = \frac{1}{j\omega C}, \Delta_Z = 0, so Y_{11}\to\infty.

Where's the mistake?

Thank you.
 
No mistake. Since the determinant of the impedance matrix is zero, there's no inverse, hence no finite Y-parameters.

If you consider the circuit, the two ports are directly wired together. Hence in reality it's a single port device.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you.

I really wanted to find the Y-parameter matrix of a Schottky diode working as mixer, whose model is this:
fig309_01.jpg


Should I conclude that it isn't posible to get it by adding capacitor Cj and resistor Rj Y-matrices, going to Z-parameters, adding the result with Rs Z-matrix, and finally going back to Y-parameters?

Thanks.
 
The Schottky is obviously part of a larger circuit - if you show us that then possibly we can advise you as to exploiting the conveniences of 2-terminal matrices, if any.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K