Calculating acceleration due to friction without mass?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the acceleration of a car due to friction without knowing its mass, it's essential to recognize that mass cancels out in the equations of motion. The problem involves a car braking with a coefficient of friction of 0.719 and gravity at 9.8 m/s². The initial confusion stemmed from the assumption that mass was necessary for the calculation. Once clarified, the acceleration can be determined using the formula a = μg, where μ is the coefficient of friction. Understanding this principle allows for the correct calculation of acceleration due to friction.
Amber_
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here is the problem:
You are driving at the speed of 28.4 m/s
(63.5426 mph) when suddenly the car in
front of you (previously traveling at the same
speed) brakes. Considering an average human
reaction, you press your brakes 0.505 s later.
Assume that the brakes on both cars are fully
engaged and that the coefficient of friction is
0.719 between both cars and the road.
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s 2

Calculate the acceleration of the car in front
of you when it brakes.
Answer in units of m/s 2

Note: this is the first part of a multipart question.

2. The attempt at a solution

I know exactly how I would do this problem, were the masses of the cars given. I honestly have no idea how you would get the acceleration due to friction without knowing the mass of the car. Is it possible that this is a mistake in the problem, or am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amber_ said:
I know exactly how I would do this problem, were the masses of the cars given.

Ok, I give you the mass. It is equal to m.
 
I thought of that, but . . . oh. Oops.

Clearly I didn't think hard enough before because I didn't realize the m's should cancel out. Okay I get it now! Thanks for that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top