Calculating Acceleration of a Barge Being Pulled by a Horse Along a Canal

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the initial acceleration of a barge being pulled by a horse, with a focus on applying Newton's second law of motion (F=ma). The barge has a mass of 5000 kg, and the tension in the rope is 500 N. Participants clarify that the angle of the rope's pull must be considered, requiring trigonometric functions to resolve the tension into a component parallel to the canal. The final calculation shows that the barge's acceleration is approximately 0.098 m/s². The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in physics problems.
Pirang
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me with this question? I would appreciate it.

A horse pulls a barge of mass 5000 kg along a canal using a rope 10 m long. The rope is attached to a point on the barge 2m from the bank. As the barge starts to move, the tension in the rope is 500 N. Calculate the barge's initial acceleration parallel to the bank.

Please explain hehe physics is not my strong side :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mkay, so the basic physics principle here is the relationship betwenn pulling forces and the resulting motion. In this simple case, the two interacting areas are the forces and the resulting ACCELERATION of the barge. This physical phenomenon is called Neto'ns second law of motion, which in mahematical form states that F=ma, where F is the NET force acting on a body and a is the resulting acceleration.

The question here is figuring out what information is useful here. since he formual does not need lengths of any kind, all you have left is the mass of the barge and the tension in the rope. The tension is force and the barge is a mass. I think you got it from here dude.
 
Damn this was easy!
I think the question is complicated and therefore hard to understand. What is the use of saying that the point the rope is connected to is 2m away from the bank or that the rope is 10m long. WHY EVEN MENTION A CANAL?

well, thank you. This was quite simple :D
 
DaMastaofFisix said:
Mkay, so the basic physics principle here is the relationship betwenn pulling forces and the resulting motion. In this simple case, the two interacting areas are the forces and the resulting ACCELERATION of the barge. This physical phenomenon is called Neto'ns second law of motion, which in mahematical form states that F=ma, where F is the NET force acting on a body and a is the resulting acceleration.

The question here is figuring out what information is useful here. since he formual does not need lengths of any kind, all you have left is the mass of the barge and the tension in the rope. The tension is force and the barge is a mass. I think you got it from here dude.

I'm afraid this analysis is wrong. You need to resolve the tension so that it is parallel to the canal, at the moment it is cutting it diagonally across. The question only asks for the acceleration parallel to the canal, not the net acceleration. This question requires the use of trig, that is why the lengths are given.
 
Now that you put it this way, I figured out that sin A = 2/10 = 11.5 degrees. Since F = 500 x cos 11.5
F = 490 N approximately
F = ma

490 = 5000 x a

490/5000 = a

a = 0.098 m/seconds squared

This look correct?
 
Pirang said:
Now that you put it this way, I figured out that sin A = 2/10 = 11.5 degrees. Since F = 500 x cos 11.5
F = 490 N approximately
F = ma

490 = 5000 x a

490/5000 = a

a = 0.098 m/seconds squared

This look correct?

Looks good to me. :smile: Note - I sent you a PM to see this thread, I didn't want you writing up incorrect work! :wink:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top