Calculating Acceleration of Gravity w/ Kinematics

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesuslovesu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of gravity using kinematics by measuring the time a body takes to pass two horizontal lines, A and B, separated by a distance h. The derived formula for gravity is g = 8h/(Ta^2 - Tb^2), where Ta and Tb are the times taken to pass lines A and B, respectively. Participants suggest expressing initial velocities as functions of gravity and time, utilizing kinematic equations to relate these variables. The conversation emphasizes the need for algebraic manipulation to isolate gravity in the equations provided. The thread concludes with encouragement for further exploration of the problem.
jesuslovesu
Messages
185
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The acceleration of gravity can be measured by project a body upward and measuring the time that it takes to pass two given points in both directions. Show that if the time the body takes to pass a horizontal line A in both directions is Ta and the time to go by a second line B in both directions is Tb then assuming that the acceleration is constant, its magnitude is g = 8h/(Ta^2-Tb^2)

Homework Equations


y = y0 + 1/2 g t^2 + vot


The Attempt at a Solution



There is a diagram where A is the lower position and B is the higher position, they are separated by a distance h.

I found Ta = -2/g vy and Tb = -vy +- sqrt(vy^2 - 2gh)
but I really don't know where to go after this...
If I want acceleration a = dv/dt and v = dx/dt but I'm not quite sure what to do next... If I say delta T = Ta - Tb but that's all i can get.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll need 2 equations to solve this problem:

1. Express the initial velocities Va and Vb as a function f(g,ta) and f(g,tb) respectively. This can be done using the s = vt + 0.5at^2 kinematics equation.

2. Use the kinematics equation: Vb^2 = Va^2 + 2gh

From equation 2, you can substitute out Vb and Va into a function purely of g and t. From there, it's just algebra. Good luck.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top